I agree. What is right, is right. "Absolute power corrupts", you hear that all the time. In the case of the boot camp guards, that is true. Boot camps are probably one of the best deterrent programs for young offenders ever conceived, but there should be rigorous hire-in and thorough ongoing psychological testing, and safeguards in place to stop stuff like this from happening. In the case of the Jena 6, I don't care if some of the attackers were "good kids" before this. "This" was enough. They were like a pack of dogs after a cat....no thought, no compassion, no care of pain inflicted. If the races had been reversed....six white guys beating one black guy....they would call it a hate crime. Criminals all with gang mentality...Jena 6 and guards. Treat them all alike.
2007-10-13 02:06:42
·
answer #1
·
answered by claudiacake 7
·
0⤊
1⤋
What crime precisely has a "pervert" dedicated? i will say it extra susinctly: What do you mean by using a pervert? Have they even dedicated against the regulation? Have they even dedicated against the regulation punishable by using penitentiary or boot camp? Ahhh, guy, have I ignored yet another assembly? From the seem of it, "pervert" has been redefined as a word meaning offender of a few form... can everybody tell me whilst that occurred? i think all and sundry of you has some form of sexual deviation in some way or different, no count how little... a pervert isn't inevitably a paedophile, rapist or the different offender. And this is no longer mandatory for a pervert to have performed something of a offender nature. A pervert may well be some one that likes the "turn of a ladie's ankle perhaps somewhat too plenty" or "needs to verify women persons lined in trifle" or maybe "somebody that masterbates too often", to no longer say i do in comparison to ladie's ankles in spite of the undeniable fact that, and if this is sherry trifle then i'm up for fairly plenty something! And any male over the age of 14 has been accountable of the final one at one time or yet another! Joking aside, this needless to say does no longer forestall a paedophile, rapist or different sexual predator from being a pervert in spite of the undeniable fact that... or in any way cut back their crime. yet a pervert isn't inevitably a offender and has no longer inevitably dedicated something to be punished for! in case you don't comprehend then study it returned extra slowly.
2016-12-18 06:22:42
·
answer #2
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Jail time for the Jena 6, 5 against 1 is an assault and if it was 6 whites, the blacks would be demanding lots of jail time and be suing everyone.
2007-10-13 02:03:47
·
answer #3
·
answered by bbj1776 5
·
0⤊
2⤋
Since the general public never gets all the facts, but only what the media sensationalizes and wants us to get, it is really not possible for us to render an intelligent and logical opinion. I would have to have all the facts first.
2007-10-13 02:15:07
·
answer #4
·
answered by Bill 6
·
2⤊
0⤋
You missed 95% of the story.
2007-10-13 01:59:33
·
answer #5
·
answered by spir_i_tual 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
When someone beats another person to death, or near death, then they should spend some time in jail, no matter their reason for doing so.
2007-10-13 01:56:47
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
Two judges got away with murder
2007-10-13 02:28:42
·
answer #7
·
answered by frank 5
·
2⤊
0⤋