It is not right to insult the developmentally disabled.
2007-10-13 01:53:31 · 23 answers · asked by Darth Vader 6 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
She is a woman, so yes calling her a man would be inaccurate. The same holds true for John Edwards in reverse. Now saying she is producing testosterone and acting very manly could be completely acceptable. The same holds true for John Edwards lack of testosterone
2007-10-13 01:58:10 · answer #1 · answered by libsticker 7 · 8⤊ 2⤋
you comprehend, each and every now and then, you will possibly desire to comprehend that normally a individual can show such animus against others that it does not seem extremely primary. Ann Coulter is a sort of people. whilst somebody calls 9/11 widow obscene names because of the fact they espouse a political view diverse from her very own, it particularly is erroneous in any context. i can pay attention to hurry with a humorousness at what he can get away with, yet no longer Ann, she leaves me feeling like i want a tub. Its like whilst the human beings in England went to Bedlam to snort on the loopy human beings. You ask your self whether shes loopy to assert the flaws she does, you ask your self whether you snort, are you giggling at somebody with a borderline character ailment, or somebody who's cleverly enjoying the devil with the intention to make extra money. Left or right, incorrect remains a similar, and shes incorrect to assert and do the flaws she does interior the way she does. Its too on the brink of the sting of sanity.
2016-11-08 04:30:44 · answer #2 · answered by colbert 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Well, she is a shooter(likes to shoot guns) and I guess she does have a sharp mouth, and I guess she really knows how to tick off a lot of people, and although I find her extremely attractive as a woman, I guess her lanky figure could be misconstrued as a
man from far off. So I can understand why some would call her a man, but from where I sit, she is one very hot lady. Thank-you Jesus.
I Cr 13;8a
2007-10-13 14:10:53 · answer #3 · answered by ? 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
See? Its another case of hating the person instead of disagreeing with the message. In the past 15 years or so it has become the norm to hate people with whom we disagree. Its such a negative thing and it is usually one-sided (that is, the left hating the right). Why can't we all just get along?! BTW Its the hate that gives the other person the power that they have.
2007-10-13 02:01:08 · answer #4 · answered by onparadisebeach 5 · 3⤊ 0⤋
I've been seeing a lot of her on TV, pushing her book. She absolutely has an adams apple, I can't even look away, its been freaking me out. I think its hilarious that Coulter is so loved by the party of homophobes,
2007-10-13 02:08:49 · answer #5 · answered by Michael G 4 · 2⤊ 0⤋
And you have who on the commucrat side to compare her to. We all know there is not a decent looking intelligent woman on the commucrat side. Hell, there's not even an intelligent one. If there is, name her and post a picture. That's what I thought. But then you could post a picture of the Clairol girl John Edwards.
2007-10-13 02:26:50 · answer #6 · answered by citizenvnfla 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think she is a horrible person that will do anything in the world for a quick buck. But, a man. No. Do question her humanity from time to time, though.
2007-10-13 02:08:14 · answer #7 · answered by chicago3200000 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
I believe that she is more woman than you could handle! It takes a real man to appreciate an educated and opinionated woman!
2007-10-13 04:08:46 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Every-time I watch her talk all I can see is that HUGE adams apple bobbing all over the place. You do the math.
2007-10-13 02:15:47 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
You could probably get away with it until she went off on one of her tirades. Oh wait, she's a perfect Christian isn't she, so she wouldn't do that because she's completely free of sin.
2007-10-13 03:02:49 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋