Can a real scientist believe in the existence of god?

Question

i.e. Biologist, microbiologist, physicist, chemist. What would their position be regarding evolution, beg bang theory, origin of life, and existence of life in other parts of the universe. Please expand on your answer.

Answer 1

It shall be all too easy for a real scientist to believe in God. It is difficult with the Social Scientists, who are not real scientists, the real scientists being the Physical, Chemical and Biological ones.

A scientis works with mundane things, empirical and very earthly. He opertes in the realm of cause effect relations, in other words, the knowledge of causality or causal connection is what science is all about. Scientific knowledge is empirical, and enitere;y based on sense object contact, thus making it a cognitive knowledge. What is known, must be domonsrable in the scientific world.

A Scientist shall instantly know his limits. The limits of his knowledge is such that, there are many areas where hihs science can not operate. This indeed shall make a scientist helpless, in the knowledge which he experiences as the limit of human empirical science. There is a point, beyond which science can not go.

this realisation of the limit, the inability of human scientific knowledge, and the fniiteness of man enebales his to realise mans llimits. but, for any searching mind, thee still shall remain many things unexplained and unknown, but the knowledge of which, at the same time, is also u deniable.

What else shall be left for him to tun to then, other than the transcendental, and God? Naturally, he shall submit all hhis worries to God, and relax.

Answer 2

There is a problem in your question. Your question is "Can...... existence of god?". The problem is that you assume that you and I know what is God or at least, that I understand what is God the way you understand.
If I ask a similar question "Can you believe in the existence of Lkr?", you would immediately ask me "What?". Similarly god is one word which most people understand very differently, but all assume that the other understands the way, oneself.

Most of the semitic religions define God as one who sits in the heavens, who does justice to the human world. He is benevolent. Some consider God as He, some others as She and still some others as genderless.

There are some oriental schools, which I don't think can be called as "religion" at all in the strict sense of that word. eg. Tao, Zen, Hindu etc. These religions don't consider as God as an individual sitting in the heavens. Their thought is scientific in the strict sense. You can see how Stephen Hawking has used the word God towards the end of his book "A Brief History of Time". eg. the Hindus consider that God is the fundamental entity from which everything in the universe evolves. So it is a subtler concept above, matter, energy, time and space.

The problem now is that scientists believe that (it is a belief) everything can be known by the intellect. Whereas the oriental schools know that everything cannot be known by intellect. There are concepts beyond the understandng ability of intellect. And exactly that is why they have meditation techniques which bypasses intellect and goes into a different realm.

Modern scientists, be it, physicist, chemist, psychologist, or whatever, they all have come very close to the knowldege that there are concepts beyond intellect.

Scientists can definitely believe in the latter type of God, but not the former tipe, sitting in the heavens.

Answer 3

A real scientist- confuses me. There ARE real scientists all over the world as we discuss the issue.
I presume that they devote their lives working on tasks, experiments, or projects. By this, I mean finding another type of fuel, enhancing a fuel, studying an organism, disease, etc.
These are more tangible life projects which can benefit mankind. Researching on a project to prove god exist - my guess is no one will tackle that.
The big bang , origin of life, are things one heard about, or studied in school, those are theories among many. These are contained in books among many other books.
Existence of life in the universe, entirely possible too. Why not.

Answer 4

There is currantly on the market a book that is entitled "The Science of God" by Gerald L. Schroeder, a physicist from M.I.T.. He answers many questions most of us have. Darwism is not the only accepted answer in the scientific arena, many distinguished scientists don't believe everything they read in the papers. They require scientific analysis beyond just hear say.

Answer 5

humorous, many scientist are religions, some are even clergymen or clergymen themselves. to say all scientist do not trust in God is amazingly ignorant. most of the the finest option scientist were adult adult males and women human beings of religion. truly, there is little enormous difference between technology and faith. both seek for to help more desirable outline our existence and the universe round us. technology is in holding with remark and hypothesis, then have attempt to substantiate or deny a hypothesis, ensuing in a idea. This idea is time-honored as reality until eventually a significantly better idea or sophisticated approach makes those conclusions out of date and a significantly better understanding outcomes. some scientists get truly religions and doggedly carry onto old theories even with new conflicting data and could be purely as undesirable as some religious enthusiasts of their beliefs. faith is in holding with remark and historic memories, the basics are faith depending truly than attempt depending. nevertheless, they fundamentals are a similar: clarify the international round you and your position in it. faith don't have as a lot adaptive room as clinical theories though, yet different reviews and interpretations that variety old beliefs purely oftentimes bring about a sparkling and only somewhat different faith. this interior reason corresponding to different communities of scientist that help somewhat different theories! also, one does not truncate the different. achieveable have self belief, yet also attempt to mathematically and bodily comprehend how issues paintings. purely because all of us understand how or why particular issues take position or react, would not recommend there can't be a God in the back of all of it! Even the pope recognises that evolution or existence of existence outdoors earth does not invalidate his faith. also, even with all that your question is undesirable on its face. understand that those that do not trust in God do not trust contained in the devil, so how can they be doing his paintings? I too imagine it very ironic you bash technology at the same time as making use of the computing gadget and information superhighway that technology has presented. LOL

Answer 6

agnostics who has an intellectual attitude of free thinkers just like many scientists and mathematecians who believes that nothing can be known about the existence of god or some things outside human experience, thus being a free thinker, agnotism is humble and open about someone (god?) or something has started all of everything that is existing even beyond the big bang theory...

Answer 7

Read John Polkinghorne on this theme. The rupture between science and faith in the existence of God results from the ideological posturing of modernity.

Answer 8

Actually, if studied in depth, you'll find booth scientific fact and much of the religious dogma is quite compatible, and without drastic reevaluation. In fact, many televangelists twist and bend the scriptures far more than scientists do.

Answer 9

A scientist is open minded and will accept anything that has evidence, proof, and replicable (sp). Jumping to the supernatural explanation, however, is using CAVE MAN logic to explain the unknown....

Answer 10

Scientists are people too. They are just as prone to the emotional limitations that create religion.