1.because then what about heliospheric current sheet ,if it would have been perfectly vacuum then the sun's msgn filed strength would've been diminished at larger dist. bu its not quite sio on the other hand it increses???
2-if electric field doesn't modify space-time then how can it be effective in vacuum(where there is no other matter to transfer its "effect") and moreover it shows linkages to space in the fact that the elctric effect of a charge travel with c=3*10^8 m/s>>>>>>>????????????????/
plz give full explanation...
fast!!
2007-10-12 22:10:07 · 7 answers · asked by Swapnil B 2 in Science & Mathematics ➔ Physics
thanks but...so then is there any fluid which is responsible for the intensification os suns magnetic field?
and plz ans Q2) also..
2007-10-12 22:33:05 · update #1
thanks!
If you say that elctric-magnetic vibrations are a property of space then surely enough there should be SOME CHANGE in the space where the wave is passing from as comp. to other energy free area(lets say), or is it that some other(5th) dimension is responsible for this inherent property of space-5th dim. net??-please comment on this...............................!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
2007-10-15 03:56:39 · update #2
cmmon somebody take a look at what details i've added recently..
n yes....i am talking about the INTENSIFICATION of sun's varying magnetic field which becomes around 90-100 times over a distance due to something called 'cuurrent in' medium filling interplanetary space.
2007-10-18 05:41:22 · update #3
Yes and it is also mass.
I could liken your question to asking you one, or in comparison lets look at it this way
Is a planetary ocean water?................................
Yes and it is also mass.
Vacuum function traverses around and through finite small mass particles as the Universe expands outward.
Vacuum = particle cohesion, and also = Gravity.
Without Universal expansion = there would be no vacuum.
Without fine matter, or aether = vacuum function would not be demonstrated.
Without vacuum = gravitational mass would not attract.
Vacuum acceleration is stretching in all linear and non linear angles with expansion and it traverses an abundant many directions simultaneously and unequally by linear length of universal expansion in multiple linear directions, although near equal in linear speed.
More equal is the curvature around mass in all directions, thus in microgravity environments water, and or mass takes the form of spheres with regard to observation over measured time.
With water the measured time of the observation is shorter and thus more quickly observable.
2007-10-12 23:44:14 · answer #1 · answered by Thoughtfull 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Interplanetary space is an almost perfect vacuum; intergalactic space, even better. Electric and magnetic fields don't need matter. The coupling of changing electromagnetic fields is a property of space. That's what lets light propagate. Nothing is being transferred in a static electric field. The magnetic field is considered to be the relativistic aspect of the changing electric field.
That should be enough to help focus your studies. I don't understand the rest of your questions. What intensification of the sun's magnetic field are you talking about?
2007-10-13 06:22:44 · answer #2 · answered by Frank N 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
The interplanetary space can't exactly be termed as vacuum because the areas which we have had access contain ions even if they are a rarefied media. But largely outside the planetary bodies it is nothingness.
2007-10-13 05:18:18 · answer #3 · answered by aravind 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
A vacuum can be defined as a lack of pressure, interplanetary space certainly qualifies for that description.
2007-10-13 12:26:54 · answer #4 · answered by johnandeileen2000 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
I know some astronomer who claims interplanetary and intergalactic space are full of "black matter". What exactly that is he can't define in any way I can understand, however.
2007-10-13 05:21:15 · answer #5 · answered by dutchboy_80 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Do you know anything of electronics ? electron accelerators or even cathode ray tubes ? Their working might help explain about suns rays intensifying over distance . Space is not complete vaccuum cannot be , there would be no orbits only straight lines .
2007-10-13 06:54:41 · answer #6 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
it was explained to me that a vacuum is where only virtual particles can exist, if nehting, meaning that the 'particles' only exist in that space instantenously, and therefore is no permanent matter. i dont know if this really relates to ur question tho
2007-10-13 05:25:21 · answer #7 · answered by two_quic 1 · 0⤊ 1⤋