What I mean is Gore actually should have been president in 2000, however I do not particularly like Bush but I don't care to bash him either and was wondering what the fascination with doing that really is?
2007-10-12 22:05:11 · 12 answers · asked by B-Man 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
youve got to be kidding me. eight years later and you still havent gotten over it. get the facts right ok, SELECTED COUNTIES were challenged and in only one instance out of four did gore have the REMOTEST chance of coming close. this idea that the liberals can stack a deck and whine about things being unfair is totally ludicrous. the fascination was a mask for the pelosi/reid regimes return to power. they felt if they could mislead the country on the war for iraq that they would be able to insulate themselves for a potential long term ride leading this country. the reality is the mandate was "razor thin" to the point were they literally had a brain damaged senator on roll call and once the american public realized what was happening the approval rate dropped to 11 percent, less than one third of the presidents.
again, its grandstanding, something the pelosi/reid regime is quite good at,
2007-10-13 00:15:08 · answer #1 · answered by koalatcomics 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
you've a top to dislike everyone you want. He did alot of sturdy issues as President consisting of the warfare adverse to terrorism all alone turf which i don't believe of no different president could have finished or could have the balls to do except perchance for Reagan. undergo in techniques his invasion of Iraq changed into UN counseled and changed into an allied attempt. As for the concentrated visitor workers bill i'm interior a similar boat as you're. personality smart i'm back with you yet i imagine of the sturdy not the undesirable on a scale i could price him like 7/10 as President as someone with morals a 2/10 or perhaps then i'd be giving him to a lot credit.
2016-10-09 03:30:37 · answer #2 · answered by menachekanian 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
People have this idea that Bush stole an election but .5% of a margin that only 54% of the people voted it. But i am glad he did Gore would have been a nightmare. the man makes up more than .. well bush. But mainly its cause he says nuculear, i still laugh everytime i hear that. I also think CNN MSNBC and ect have alot of sway on people in our country and when the screaming liberals say hate this person for 8 years straight i guess eventually people start to listen
2007-10-12 22:15:22 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
I agree Al was the winner. But what good does it do bashing our president. To Error is human. It is the presidents job to make decisions that affect our country. He can not please everyone. People bash him about the war. Why? I ask myself. This war is helping people who need help, this war has stopped how many other 911 from happening. Yes he has made some choices people are not happy with. His biggest mistake was accepting the first term, when in all reality he new Al won. If Clinton would have declared a recount he would have been accused of taking with Al Gore since he was the vice president at the time. But now Al Gore one the Noble Peace Prize. So him not being in the Oval office has not held him back. people still think Al is going to sneak in and run for president. I disagree. He just won a Noble peace prize for his work with global warming. If were to run for president it would be good, only to give Hillary a little competition. But he has his book and his global warming to focus on. So he can not just drop the book he wrote and run for president. I do believe he would win if he ran though.
2007-10-12 22:12:58 · answer #4 · answered by vault 5 · 1⤊ 3⤋
People have lost sight of the cohesiveness that has traditionally bound this country at its seams and the fact that respect - even if in disagreement - for whoever is sitting in the Oval Office is a crucial part of that cohesiveness.
There are many in this country who are currently mistakenly buying into the likes of Amy Goodman and their push for subversiveness and outrage toward our system of government.
They demand that their followers be unhappy and unsatisfied with all facets of American life.
If our youth abandoned their families, took to the streets, took up their bongs and started eating out of trash cans while camping out on the beach, Amy would be quite proud of her accomplishment.
Hillary would smile, also.
2007-10-12 22:34:23 · answer #5 · answered by wider scope 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
i think its a universal problem called scraping the bottom of the barrel. in Australia john Howard seems like he wont go away but maybe its because the others aren't that good of a choice either!
or maybe we like to complain because we'd like to think that we could do a better job(egotistical maybe)...lol
but as us small people struggle to get ahead in this world it feels that we are sometimes forgotten eg. health care, education, and rates seem to rise every other day. the great Australian dream of owning a house is fast escaping people! but our government is in bushes pocket fighting a war against weapons of mass destruction that do not seem to exist. i dont even like bush and i live in another country!
2007-10-12 22:28:00 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Vote ratio question ask a sensus taker/
has age where you live voter turn out? are you registers/legal to vote all these questions arise when voting..
Bush won cause people could make up there mind..
between him and kerry so a lot voted out side party lines
2008 we are startin all over again..
10 republicans? and maybe 6 democrats...
have heard to many independants..??
2007-10-12 22:12:03 · answer #7 · answered by ? 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
I don't know why. I mean recently there have been huge advances made in making the general population aware of the problems of the mentally disabled, and encouraging us to accept these disadvantaged people into the mainstream of society.
2007-10-12 22:10:23 · answer #8 · answered by cymry3jones 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
People love to hate their boss, and unfortunately whether Bush has caused any problems, he being head of state will always have to accept the blame, whether it is his fault or not......My problem is they do not give him proper credit...
..pulled us out of a recession, depression after 911. unemployment record low...more people own their own home...
...kept us safe!..Killed 2 mass murderers (Saddam's sons) in Iraq and removed a mass murderer,
...I believe history will be much Kinder!
2007-10-12 22:17:31 · answer #9 · answered by Rada S 5 · 2⤊ 2⤋
they want to protest but they don't want to get detained and torchered for 4 years.
2007-10-12 22:10:29 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋