I'd really like to have this explained. Do you think the angles are actually good in this show? how? what keeps you watching this shitmess of wrestling show?
2007-10-12 20:21:28 · 10 answers · asked by tregatron 1 in Sports ➔ Wrestling
AMEN brother this show is a mess it is ran by Jeff Jarret the man who has made himself king of the mountain multiple times and nwa champ multiple times and its a nonsense ******* show with no ******* backing at all and its a disgrace to pro wrestling and its a disgrace for the simple reason that they paid pac man jones over 250,000 dollars for 1 month deal of tv appearances...what a ****** pathetic company who could of used that money for better talent....and then they have a fake carlito cabana...a meditation skit with dutt and west...and 5 horrible mic interviews and then karen angle and kurt angle argue...30 minutes of wrestling for 2 hours what a waste of tv time...for the fans who say wwe is 30 minutes of wrestling for 2 hours well tna is doing the same damn thing so get over it....tna is a waste of space and waste of tv time they will die in 2009 when there tnn contract is up and they wont be resigned and no other cable channel is going to pick them up....so you tna fans out there who say they got more talent well im not seeing it all im seeing is a fake macho man randy savage, a bartender named aj styles, a 50 year old tage team of the steiner brothers, a pill popper for a champ kurt angle, junior fatu who is always running away from the law, and then the fake wanna be rock christian cage.....no talent....rip off of a mexican 6 sided ring that they said they invented....the show is garbage just like there watchers.....TNA WILL DIE 2009 VINCE MCMAHON WILL OWN THEM JUST LIKE HE OWNED ECW AND WCW.....NO ONE CAN COMPETE WITH THE BILLION DOLLAR GENIUS WHEN HE IS TEMPTED........TNA R.I.P 2009
2007-10-12 20:29:53 · answer #1 · answered by (Genibus Nitito Canus) 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
TNA has better athletes delivering consistently better wrestling matches. I don't really care about "storylines" (WWE or TNA). TNA PPVs, taken as a whole, are better shows than the WWE puts on -- TNA has more matches, more wrestlers, less 5-minute ring entrances, less 5-minute recaps of every storyline before every match, and they don't charge as much. It all boils down to what happens in the ring (for me), and TNA delivers more consistently than the WWE.
2007-10-12 20:31:52 · answer #2 · answered by The Dragon 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Some of the angles in TNA are stupid. One thing that wwe beats tna in is building up a story and promoting it to the max. Thats why we will never get that amazing feud from TNA like we have been getting from wwe. (mvp , matt hardy) (Edge vs john cena) (dx vs vince) etc
2007-10-12 23:38:51 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I watch TNA for the action in the ring, not the angles. If you don't want to watch it, then don't. By the way the booking in WWE isn't any better.
2007-10-12 22:41:36 · answer #4 · answered by Steve 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I settle for as genuine with you. in my view, i assume WWE has been improving critically purely in the purely astounding 5 months. they have had a set of surprises (Jeff Hardy beating Triple H, JBL returning, the essential Brothers helping area, Orton preserving at WM, Cena's Royal Rumble return, etc.). the total present champions have earned their titles, and are deserving champions. the single catch 22 situation I even have with WWE is they have not been pushing feuds over the midcard and tag team titles, apart from Matt Hardy vs. MVP. uncooked's tag paintings rigidity branch is getting greater, yet Smackdown's remains lacking and Jericho has yet to have a feud over the IC call. yet persons seem to whinge approximately stuff that WWE hasn't tangled up on. persons whine approximately Triple H constantly getting call photos. He infrequently ever had call fits from June of 2005 different than now. After his feud with Batista, Triple H's purely PPV international call fits have been at WM 22, Backlash 2006, No Mercy 2007, WM 24, and Backlash 2007. it quite is purely 5 call photos in 3 years. Others are transforming into to be far extra opportunities in that factor physique than Triple H. additionally, Triple H's 11 reigns upload as much as purely 29 months complete. it quite is under 3 months in keeping with reign. I purely do no longer see how Triple H is stealing the international call "spotlight" from each individual else. i assume, no count what, you would be unable to make anybody delighted. persons desire "new" prevalent eventers, yet whilst CM Punk wins MITB or William Regal wins KOTR, each individual complains. additionally, i don't get complaining approximately faces worthwhile constantly. they are faces, this is their activity. The informal fan does no longer desire to verify the nice guy lose in any respect situations. WCW grow to be regularly occurring for having the heels flow over all of the time. faster or later, it was undesirable for commerce. i think of WWE is on the right computer screen and is improving plenty no longer too some time past. I even have been extra thinking approximately it presently than i've got been in an particularly long term.
2016-12-18 06:15:27 · answer #5 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Nothing TNA does makes much sense....but the matches are usually fun to watch.
2007-10-12 20:30:51 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
i m not particularly a fan of TNA
but i tried to watch it but couldnt continue because it wasnt upto the standards that we the pro wrestling fans are use to of it
( wwe)
They need a lot of overhauling in order to win the fans
otherwise they will go out of business
2007-10-12 22:47:54 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
tna rocks
2007-10-12 23:27:41 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
well im not a TNA fAn
2007-10-16 19:17:22 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
it doesn't really make sense, they have made soooo many mistakes ( PAC man Jones , etc) I'm surprised they're still on TV.
♠
2007-10-13 00:12:25 · answer #10 · answered by ♠Sting♠™ 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋