If all Men are wipe-out, the world would be corrupted. Men hold the majority of the world power, women don't have a clue on how to run things.
The human race would become extinct. Without Men, there is no world.
Now if there is a disease that'll wipe-out/kill off all the feminist, the world would be a much nicer place.
2007-10-12 21:22:24
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
4⤋
It's a wild scenario, but I think if this happened the women left would adapt. An economy can only be maintained if there is a stability of population. If the women left could maintain reproduction (likely with the vast amounts of stored sperm that exist) then I think the female-only world would be able to adapt new economies in order to sustain a society.
Gender is irrelevant when it comes to governing ability. Some men have a fatherly instinct. Some women have a motherly instinct. I think this translates into an equality in leadership potential. The approaches on leading and governing could be different, but those speculated approaches are socially constructed by our present society. Even now as I answer, I speak from our sexually dimorphic society. I am biased to think that a female run world would be less violent and would be much more altruistic because we look at women as more empathic and averted to physical confrontation.
Once that sexually dimorphic society is gone and it becomes totally female I wouldn't be surprised if the world slowly came to mirror the state of our male-dominated world today, possibly within a few short years after the sense of collectivism the disaster created wears off. Wars and political hegemony aren't caused because men are in power. They're caused by differences in 'living' and scarcity. Economy. Trade. Resources (territory). Religion. Government (i.e. democratic vs. authoritarian). Wealth. These are the factors you want to look at when thinking about world stability, not gender.
Thinking more about it now, I'd speculate a rapid loss of men would create a widespread sense of panic and sudden power vacuums that would throw the world into political chaos. There would be frequent vast shifts in political power and ideas and a rough economic transition that would be detrimental to world stability. There would be huge changes in the ideas of family that would create intense friction with women trying to hold on to traditional social and religious views. Many women in the Southern US, Eastern Europe, the Middle East, and South Asia willingly accept and are comfortable with the "superiority" of men in the household and society. The sudden social vacuums would terrify and panic them which equals additional instability.
Let's just say it would be very rocky for a while, regardless of what gender is left.
2007-10-12 22:29:11
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
As distasteful as the thought might be, I believe the economy would collapse. The presence of men is a very vital part of the worldwide economy...whether women want or like to acknowledge that or not. The stock market alone would be decimated...and companies would close at a frightening rate.
I do believe, however, that a new economy would take hold...but it would take a very long time. Not because women are not capable of pulling it together, but frankly, I don't believe we are as accustomed to working together or cooperatively in the same way men are.
2007-10-13 00:55:15
·
answer #3
·
answered by Super Ruper 6
·
3⤊
0⤋
You have two questions there.
One, would the world economy collapse?
You'd have to define collapse. The economy will definitely be impacted, but not necessarily collapse as in devastated. Many markets, products cater to men (suits, ties, porn, etc). Without the buyers, then these businesses will suffer in turn, this will cause a domino effect on their network of businesses.
Second, would women be able to run things?
Absolutely. Men are no smarter than women. There is no proof for this. There is proof of differences in which each gender do tend to excel in (i.e. women in spatial tasks), but by no means does it mean that women are such intellectually inferior that traditional male jobs cannot be replaced by women making the decisions.
The gap in male leaders vs females is mostly from society's own doing of suppressing the female gender from academics and the working world.
2007-10-12 21:31:40
·
answer #4
·
answered by Bennie 3
·
0⤊
2⤋
I actual have a spare tire for all my vehicles and vehicles. Does that recommend i'm paranoid about a flat tire? Nope purely being prepared in case I do. nicely same is going for holding issues waiting for an emergency. a tactics too a lot of human beings be counted upon the keep. and many realized how a organic disaster can empty shops contained in the realm by using panic shoppers or lack of delivery. Do i imagine it is going to hit the fan? I don’t imagine it is going to take position i understand it is going to take position. the enormous question is at the same time as, 20 years, 80 years, 100 and 20 years? I don’t understand. yet each and every united states in the international had one component or yet another that shook their international to the bone. And to imagine the u . s . is data against it truly is stupid. i could imagine Peal Harbor and the dual towers taught u . s . to be alert and prepared. And even with the claims by using the folk responsible that they have it coated I don’t purchase that. One massive earth quake or tidal wave could replace issues over evening. After Russia divided up numerous nuclear warheads vanished. the position are they? only one among those could turn a significant us city to damage. we are at warfare in distinct countries as we talk. Do you imagine those human beings will ignore all about us after we leave? i imagine not. lower than Yellowstone park is a enormous volcano, they say it may blow contained in the subsequent 50 years. those are actual hazards compared to zombies or extraterrestrial beings. there is not any record of zombies or extraterrestrial beings killing 1000's of thousands of human beings. yet there particular as hell is heritage of people doing that and they're going to back in the destiny.
2016-10-09 03:27:26
·
answer #5
·
answered by menachekanian 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
If A Disease That Killed ALL FEMINISTS IN AMERICA Happened, There is a Real Chance that the World Economy will Collapse. This is also true regarding deisease that would affect any other substantial sects of population such as gays, homo sexuals, hetro sexuals, bi sexuals, asexuals, people with no particular sexual orientation, people with all possible sexual orientation etc.
2007-10-12 19:55:12
·
answer #6
·
answered by ByTheWay 4
·
0⤊
2⤋
Do You have the words 'Economy' and 'Society' confused? Economies are governed by market forces. Society is the result of the interaction between people. The more of one gender the the greater influence it has.
2007-10-12 21:11:19
·
answer #7
·
answered by Ashleigh 7
·
0⤊
1⤋
No the world would flourish with less men. There would be less war and more money would be used to better the human condition. I just heard a report on National Public radio about Rwanda and most of the men were killed there in civil war. Now there legislature has the most women of any nation on earth and they are starting to do some wonderful stuff for education and health care. The women no longer have men taking there money and spending it on beer which is traditional in their culture. Now women can inherit land and they are becoming more prosperous without their lazy, sexist, oppressive husbands. Women do all the work in Africa and a lot of other countries while the men spend it on booze and prostitutes which spreads aids.
2007-10-12 21:03:15
·
answer #8
·
answered by Green Genius 4
·
0⤊
4⤋
It's possible that the world economy would suffer somewhat, but the porn industry would certainly be devastated.
2007-10-12 20:40:55
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
5⤊
0⤋
Economy would not be the farthest thing from worry.
2007-10-12 20:54:24
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋