2007-10-12 18:54:03 · 11 answers · asked by ? 2 in Society & Culture ➔ Cultures & Groups ➔ Other - Cultures & Groups
seriously?whats the diference between a man or woman?is it 1935 again and nobody told me?all yall who think its wrong are really screwed up.
2007-10-12 19:56:21 · answer #1 · answered by tweek4_ahh 1 · 2⤊ 4⤋
Well when they are around my age I think that a tattoo in the right spot can be sexy. I mean if it is on the small of her back or if she has a little one down by her vagina it can look sexy. When they get older I bet they will not look as good. I do not like women with tattoos on their arms, breasts, or around the wrist or ankle. I think they tend to loOK kinda bad. I mean they are hard to cover up and if going to church or a formal gathering then she will have to find something that will not show the tattoo. If she has one around her thigh or on her foot that is ok. Once again when she is a grandmother it might be kind of hard to explain but in another way when between the ages of say 18 to 45, they can be sexy. I myself do not want anything on me I can not change or get rid of. In all I say let the girl do what she likes as long as she knows that it will never be able to be removed and it will always be their. I mean I would not allow a thing like a tattoo stop me from dating or being with a woman I liked.
2007-10-13 02:10:04 · answer #2 · answered by Prof. Dave 7 · 2⤊ 2⤋
I think for most women, a lot of tattoos (especially ones you can't hide and look masculine) is just ewwww.
If a girl wants a tattoo I would suggest a small-mid sized one on their back (even a tramp stamp), chest, ankles, or anywhere else that's really discreet. But I also have to say I don't find too many tattoos on a man appealing either.
2007-10-13 16:57:01 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
Would never date a Lady who has either tattoos or piercings because of my personal opinions.
There was a Lady at Church whom I met and thought I might ask out, however, the next Sunday She appeared at church with both tattoos and piercings. Needless to say I forgot the dating idea immediately.
2007-10-13 12:10:29 · answer #4 · answered by Marvin R 7 · 1⤊ 2⤋
My opinion is that they are trashy-looking. I very rarely see a woman with a tattoo and think, "Oh, that's cute!" Also, I think tattoos on women look especially bad if the woman is wearing a dress.
2007-10-13 02:07:42 · answer #5 · answered by kelsey 2 · 3⤊ 4⤋
I don't like to judge people, but I don't think it's classy at all. I believe that it's important for a woman to treat her body like a temple. Respect and take care of your body ladies. I just don't feel that marking up your skin is taking care of your body. Besides that, tatoos are just unprofessional overall.
2007-10-13 02:08:54 · answer #6 · answered by kelly4u2 5 · 2⤊ 3⤋
Kat Von D has awesome tats.
Ones on the lower back are called tramp stamps for a reason.
2007-10-13 03:14:20 · answer #7 · answered by weisse 6 · 1⤊ 3⤋
As long as they're spelled correctly I have no complaints.
2007-10-13 02:46:23 · answer #8 · answered by Uncle Alan Swann 2 · 3⤊ 2⤋
I dont liek it, in any religion book says you shoukld mark your body, they dont belong to noone, and they shoudl not adore noone, if is not their god name in the tatto, they just look to me, stupid, insecure, they want to call attention, empty in their soul or jsut slutty.. If they look good, I will wear my rubber and xxx them for sure, but I dont wna tto marry a woman with nasty tattoos
2007-10-13 02:18:10 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 7⤋
Ugly,don't know any better.
2007-10-13 02:31:02 · answer #10 · answered by mikk 6 · 1⤊ 4⤋