What would Clinton have done if the 1st WTC attack would have succeeded?

Question

Would it be the same response as the USS Cole bombing? The same response to a failed terrorist attack on the WTC?

So, now that we are offically at war, thanks to a republican in the oval office, instead of sitting around getting blown up like we did, and will, with a democrat in office.
What is Clinton going to do next time he is in office and we get attacked?

If you actually believe that Clinton authorized Binladen to be killed you need to actually research the matter.

And to those of you cannot understand the question, I am referring to first WTC attack, which is not 9/11/2001. So, please, make sure you understand the question before posting to save us all some time and confusion.

I cannot believe that people want to blame Bush for the wtc attack during Clintons presidency. That just shows how some people voice their opinion after having someone give it to them, without thinking at all about anything.

Answer 1

he wouldnt have done anything

Answer 2

What he didn't do was blame HW Bush and that attack happened during his first month in office. What he did do was bring the perps to justice. He also foiled other attacks. Clinton was proactive in combatting terrorism. He proposed anti terrorism measures and the Republican Congress shut them down..There were far more Americans killed in Iraq than in the Cole and all the other attacks on Americans in foreign countries during the Clinton administration.

Answer 3

you do not elect the 9/11 reality bypass persons to be sarcastic with you, yet you get to call the 9/11 reality bypass persons idiots? Hum? Your sturdy judgment is inaccurate about Queen Elizabeth. in line with threat a significantly better functional evaluation often is the Gulf of Tonken incident. Black ops persons of the CIA and the safe practices stress have lower back and lower back been uncovered for his or her clandestine involvement in pretend flag operations. The 9/11 fee record is crammed with inaccuracies and holes. for particular, someone in authorities is hiding the very reality with reference to the events of 9/11/2001. i'm not likely to say that 9/11 replaced into an interior interest, yet you're a more desirable X X X X X once you've self assurance the tale created through the U. S. administration lower than Bush and repeated precisely through the U. S. mass media. in part of reality more desirable complicated than your tiny little options can comprehend.

Answer 4

I can tell you this for sure. He would have checked the polls before making a decision. That guy never made a move without checking them. BTW-All of the Dem's that are up in arms about Bush firing a few attorneys. Clinton fired all 93 on the first day he took office. We never heard a peep out of the Dem's when he did that.

Answer 5

He would have done things exactly the same way, covert operations and pinpoint missile strikes.

Someone here seems to be forgetting that Clinton came closer to killing Osama then Bush ever has. Or perhaps you were to busy worrying about Clinton's sex life to pay any attention to something that important?

Afterwards the republicans COMPLAINED about the missile strike, and accused the president of "wagging the dog" and the missile strikes stopped.

Answer 6

when you say terrorist, who exactly are you referring to? the u.s. govt. or the arabs? the u.s. needed something to convince the american people to go to war in the middle east. this was it. turn your cnn off and look into it a little deeper then ask yourself who the terrorists are...ask yourself why a few idiots with box cutters were able to pull something so sophisticated off. most of the time, the most successful crimes are inside jobs. think about it some more. i just love how people believe what cnn tells them. you people need to wake up and get on the internet and read news from other countries. countries with nothing to gain by telling biased news.. the american public are asleep and i wish they'd wake up before it's too late...or is it already too late?

Answer 7

This wouldn't have happened. They don't like the Bushes for some reason. George Sr. invaded Iraq a long time ago and now his son is doing it? Kind of strange that both are unsuccessful. Everyone love Bill. Everyone! Hands down the coolest president ever! But really, we wouldn't have invaded Iraq, Iran wouldn't be on the table right now. We wouldn't have gone to war, Clinton would have focused on the US and helping to rebuild and move on and prevent it in the future.

Answer 8

Just what he did during the First Iraq War. Bomb blindly and ask questions later.

http://www.infoplease.com/spot/iraq1.html
create a low profile War

Operation Northern Fox with the Brits led air strikes and kept the no fly zone intact. IN Turkey? nows in the news
Basically piss off the region enough to retaliate on US soil. Plus they had enough US intelligence information leaked to pull it off a second time. September 11. 2001.
http://www.truewordtoday.blogspot.com/

Read thru to corruption. Ask Sandy Berger where the files on terror attacks went.

Dear Felix I have one for you too.
http://freedomagenda.com/iraq/wmd_quotes

Answer 9

Felix..... finally someone who's eyes are wide open

bush is pissing on every american's head and telling them it's raining

clinton would have had approx 4,000 more americans in the census count and 28,000 less with disabilitys

bush wishes he as as smart as clinton

Answer 10

If a liberal reads this you will be reported. As long as Billy got his cigars, his buddies from France and young female interns he would have the same response.

Answer 11

he wouldnt of sat down reading stories to kids when he was told that there was an attack, he would of left in a hurry and maybe not declare war because he was a good president.