Is George Bush smart enough to win a Nobel Prize?

Question

He's not exactly known for his intelligence, nor common sense.

I'd say NO!

Answer 1

I would give him the Nobel peace prize if he was to resign tomorrow. He would make the entire World happy.

Answer 2

The Nobel Peace Prize is one of the highest accolades that can be bestowed upon a person, and it is known the world over as a mark of a life time of achievement. Bush, being the most colossal underachiever, who happened to benefit from fortunate circumstances, would never be given this prize. This great honor is given to those who CONTRIBUTE greatly to society, it is not given to those who BEFENITED greatly from society.

Bush’s intellectual acumen, or actually the lack of such intelligence, really means that he should not have even graduated from a university; much less get the most prestigious award in the world.

But there is something more fundamentally flawed with Bush than mere intellectual deficiency that would exclude him from winning the Nobel. The characteristic that Bush is the most devoid of is the willingness to promote what is good for society. Remember the name of the prize is the Nobel PEACE Prize. I emphasize peace, because, outside of the Nobel prizes given in the honor of academic and technological achievement, all Nobel Prizes divvied out to public figures are for their work to promote the public welfare and harmony. Al Gore’s aim, at curtailing the effects of global warming, certainly works towards this aim. Bush on the other hand does nothing to promote peace, the public good, or a congenial spirit in the world. Instead he has caused needless acrimony, a backlash in the Islamic world towards modernity, and stoked the fires of the global jihadist movement.

Maybe if the organizers at Nobel came out with a Nobel IDIOT Prize, the Nobel DEMAGOGUE Prize, or Nobel WARMONGER prize, Bush would probably be a shoe in.

Answer 3

The Nobel Peace Prize is between the optimum accolades which could be bestowed upon a individual, and that's time-venerated the worldwide over as a mark of a life time of success. Bush, being the main enormous underachiever, who got here approximately to earnings from fortunate circumstances, will possibly on no account take transport of this prize. This super honor is given to those who make contributions a great deal to society, that's no longer given to those who BEFENITED a great deal from society. Bush’s psychological acumen, or rather the shortcoming of such intelligence, quite skill that he don't have even graduated from a college; much less get the main prestigious award interior the worldwide. yet there is something greater if truth be told incorrect with Bush than mere psychological deficiency that could exclude him from prevailing the Nobel. The function that Bush is the main without is the willingness to sell what's robust for society. bear in mind the call of the prize is the Nobel PEACE Prize. I emphasize peace, because of the fact, exterior of the Nobel prizes given interior the respect of educational and technological success, all Nobel Prizes divvied out to public figures are for their artwork to sell the generic public welfare and unity. Al Gore’s purpose, at curbing the consequence of world warming, easily works in the direction of this purpose. Bush on the different hand does no longer something to sell peace, the generic public reliable, or a congenial spirit interior the worldwide. particularly he has led to pointless acrimony, a backlash interior the Islamic worldwide in the direction of modernity, and stoked the fires of the international jihadist flow. in step with threat if the organizers at Nobel got here out with a Nobel fool Prize, the Nobel DEMAGOGUE Prize, or Nobel WARMONGER prize, Bush might in all threat be a shoe in.

Answer 4

Unfortunately, your question is moot, as the basis for awarding the Nobel Peace Prize is the "best work for fraternity between the nations, for the abolition or reduction of standing armies and for the holding and promotion of peace congresses," not how smart someone is. Accordingly, President Bush is singularly qualified to win the Nobel Peace Prize, as he is the only leader of whom I'm aware to have abolished a standing army (Saddam Hussein's), promoted fraternity between nations (Iran and Iraq by allowing Shiites to dominate post-Hussein Iraqi politics -- quite a contrast to the Iran-Iraq War), and promoted peace congresses (diplomacy concerning Iraq's future and multilateral negotiations with North Korea). On the other hand, even if Al Gore were to single-handedly save the earth from purported global warming, all of his efforts would serve only to allow the perpetuation of human conflict on earth without contributing in any way to the furtherance of pacifism. So, unless the Nobel Peace Prize were renamed the Nobel Feel Good About Political Correctness Passed Off As Science Prize, President Bush is more entitled to win the Nobel Peace Prize than Al Gore.

Answer 5

If holding the line against domination of the world by radical Islam wouldn't be enough, then f$$$ the Nobel peace prize.

Answer 6

YES!

Bush could win the new, neo-right, Nobel War Prize.

Answer 7

I did not know that IQ was considered in the Nobel Peace Prize selection process. Can you share that criteria with us? I never knew that intelligence was considered. You could knock me over with a feather right now.

Answer 8

George Bush isn't even smart enough to win a Darwin Award.

Answer 9

Whether he is or isn't, isn't the issue.

What is is this.

It's not hard at all to win the Nobel Peace Prize today.

Why?

You just have to be a liberal, anti-American, communist/ dictator lover, white male hater, and a traditional family hater.

Isn't that so sad?

Now, you may say, how do I know those are the qualification need to win the Nobel Peace Prize.

All you have to do is look at the winners of it.

Answer 10

No, but he would unanimously win the Dumbbell Prize!