Nobel prize winner Al Gore for President of the United States of America- why or why not?

Answer 1

Because hes a loser and a hypocrite. Global warming didn't just start because Bush was elected and Gore had ample chance to do something about it in the 90s when he was VP.

Answer 2

Hm-mm i won't be able to see Gore combating 9/11 so he might have had to handle the autumn out of that. All of Gore's initiatives could have been sidetracked I nonetheless think of Gore might have liberated Afghanistan from the Taliban There could be a conflict interior the middle east nonetheless , only distinctive than this one. Saddam Hussein could have been very emboldened via 9/11 and via Iran identifying on Ahmadinejad. in step with threat they might have restarted the conflict between themselves, in step with threat they might have attacked Israel alongside with Lebanon. So Gore could have been sending in troops to Israel to bathe out the Iranians/Iraqis/Lebanese or Al qudia might have made a helpful attack on the U. S. returned because of the fact there could have been no Patriot Act to collect intelligence and thwart it So Gore might have went into the 2004 marketing campaign with a disaster interior the middle East and yet another (or 3) terrorist assaults interior the united states of a So McCain might have won in 2004 There could have been an air marketing campaign solely for Iraq/Iran, like Kosovo maximum of the U. S. financial gadget runs on housing that this cooling we see now might take place no matter who's president - so as that's the comparable as that's now all in all, the comparable as at the instant

Answer 3

Not. If he runs for President, then he will essentially being using the Nobel Peace Prize for his own personal gain, which defeats the purpose of the award. If I were him, I'd wait an election, if I ran at all. He's probably doing more good as an environmental hero than he would be trying to fix the impossible problems the current Presidential administration has created.

Answer 4

No. Al Gore is not a scientist, he did no research on global warming. He just happened to have the time and money to make a documentary about climate change.

Answer 5

He would probably make a good president. I think it would be bad for him to become one though because everyone would say everything hes done was politics and to help him in the election. He may not have enough time too, Preliminaries are after Christmas.

Answer 6

I would vote for Gore before I'd vote for Hillary.

Answer 7

When good sense prevails is for more serious reasons than what others will say that these kind od options are taken.

By the way - is he candidate?

Answer 8

I think that he should run for president. I would definitely vite for him. He has good ideas for our climate and he unlike other candidates, has tried to do something about it. His actions speak louder than others words.

Answer 9

He's a liar, a fraud, and a liberal democrat that hates America and Americans. Need anymore "why nots?"

Answer 10

Better Chicken Little than ManBearPig!