English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2007-10-12 14:04:58 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Politics

oops, I meant "They say.."

2007-10-12 14:05:29 · update #1

8 answers

You obviously don't know how a Nobel prize is earned. And "God Bless America" poster, where's yours if it's so easy?

2007-10-12 14:09:10 · answer #1 · answered by katydid 7 · 1 1

The basis for awarding the Nobel Peace Prize is the "best work for fraternity between the nations, for the abolition or reduction of standing armies and for the holding and promotion of peace congresses." Accordingly, it's quite likely a recount will show that President Bush actually won the Nobel Peace Prize, as he is the only leader of whom I'm aware to have abolished a standing army (Saddam Hussein's), promoted fraternity between nations (Iran and Iraq by allowing Shiites to dominate post-Hussein Iraqi politics -- quite a contrast to the Iran-Iraq War), and promoted peace congresses (diplomacy concerning Iraq's future and multilateral negotiations with North Korea). On the other hand, even if Al Gore were to single-handedly save the earth from purported global warming, all of his efforts would serve only to allow the perpetuation of human conflict on earth without contributing in any way to the furtherance of pacifism. So, unless the Nobel Peace Prize were renamed the Nobel Feel Good About Political Correctness Passed Off As Science Prize, President Bush is more entitled to win the Nobel Peace Prize than Al Gore, a fact that will likely become clear once the recount is complete.

2007-10-12 14:56:05 · answer #2 · answered by Rationality Personified 5 · 0 1

looky here yall. let me osama bush ladan tells yal sumptin.

recount in floranceda and in odhio

then if it aint workin right we'll just sue al gores for that there nubian prize. okie dokie.

just like i wons the uhlecshun fair and skware- i sued like any other dummy would to be prezidunt

heck i wants a nubian pizza prize too. and i';ll suees gore again dag darnet.

2007-10-12 14:17:36 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

It's not hard at all to win the Nobel Peace Prize today.

Why?

You just have to be a liberal, anti-American, communist/ dictator lover, white male hater, and a traditional family hater.

Isn't that so sad?

Now, you may say, how do I know those are the qualification need to win the Nobel Peace Prize.

All you have to do is look at the winners of it.

EDIT: Katydid: I wouldn't be able to win it because I don't support any of those qualifications above.

2007-10-12 14:07:35 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 4

I don't know that there was a conflict of interest involving the other parties' siblings . . . with regards to the nobel prize.

2007-10-12 14:15:21 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

No. We'll concede the prize for now. Later, when the country is a little more open to Al Gore attacks, we'll claim he stole the prize and he suppressed our rights and demands to a recount.

Brilliant!

katydid: GOD BLESS AMERICA doesn't have a prize because he obviously doesn't hate America and isn't a liberal. Not his fault, or mine, if you lack basic comprehension skills.

2007-10-12 14:18:06 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1 3

no, actually in this sense i side with the blue hairs from miami dade, we need a do over as i sure dont understand it.

2007-10-12 14:30:21 · answer #7 · answered by koalatcomics 7 · 0 1

He's done nothing good to achieve world peace.

2007-10-12 14:09:04 · answer #8 · answered by RICARDVS VII 3 · 0 2

fedest.com, questions and answers