I think this sums you up.
"It is not the critic who counts: not the man who points out how the strong man stumbles or where the doer of deeds could have done better. The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena, whose face is marred by dust and sweat and blood, who strives valiantly, who errs and comes up short again and again, because there is no effort without error or shortcoming, but who knows the great enthusiasms, the great devotions, who spends himself for a worthy cause; who, at the best, knows, in the end, the triumph of high achievement, and who, at the worst, if he fails, at least he fails while daring greatly, so that his place shall never be with those cold and timid souls who knew neither victory nor defeat."Theodore Roosevelt
2007-10-12 13:32:42
·
answer #1
·
answered by Michael F 3
·
5⤊
4⤋
Actually that's not what happened. I know you ignore facts, but maybe someone else will find this useful.
Nobody attacked the child. They did point out that the child was in a private school and was in a private school before the accident. They did point out the parents lived in a wealthy area. They did point out the child's parents dropped their private insurance explicitly to jump on the government program. They did point out that the child was not living in poverty. They did point out that the parents had several investments. They did point out that the child was covered under the old rendition of the bill, not the expansion the Democrats wanted. They did point out that President Bush wanted to expand the program to cover 4 million more children. They did point out that Democrats wanted to change the definition of "child" to include anyone 25 years old or younger.
You see, Democrats brought out a child, scripted a lie for the child to tell, exploited the child on national TV. And yet when the "neocon party" gives you the rest of the story, the parts of the story the left wants to keep in the dark, they are "attacking the poor wittwe children."
Hell, several reports in the mainstream media even called the child a "12 year old activist." You exploit children and then attack people who would dare tell the truth.
2007-10-12 13:43:54
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
4⤊
2⤋
Making up your own facts again, right??? Rush didn't attack a poor child, he went after the exploitation of the child by the left. The left will use anyone to carry their message, and have now decided to trot out a child and tell him what to say. Sfaa said it best. Facts seem to elude the left, maybe you should listen to Rush's Show, or Fox News now and then rather than the lame liberal shows and blogs, it's always better to educate yourself before running your mouth!
2007-10-12 13:45:50
·
answer #3
·
answered by rosi l 5
·
4⤊
1⤋
So the right-wingers are condemning what is good and decent for America?? And this "good and decent" means another DUMBOCRAP social program that will cost the "PRODUCTIVE" Americans more in taxes? Productive Americans will pay more taxes in order to have lazy, inept, NON-PRODUCTIVE Libturds see an increase in their WELFARE PROGRAMS?
Oh, and by the way, that "poor" 12-year-old goes to a private school at a cost of $20,000 a year in tuition.
2007-10-12 13:45:58
·
answer #4
·
answered by george s 2
·
4⤊
1⤋
Nice try...But the criticism was directed at the Libs who trotted out this kid and fed him propaganda lines to read. It was the very health care bill that Bush was supporting expanding that saved this kid in the first place. So just what was he supposedly trying to help other kids get...since the current program was what saved him?
2007-10-12 14:22:03
·
answer #5
·
answered by kathy_is_a_nurse 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
i don't believe of all of us is smearing the youngster. I do imagine that his self-indulgent hippie mom and father are the challenge! Dad is self-em-ployed and has 4 childrens. Gee, perchance he could get a job with reward like something human beings ought to. He fathered the youngsters, enable him help them. by the way, changed into there any coverage funds?
2016-10-09 03:00:46
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
You people are so uninformed it is incrdible ,scratch the surface of this debate and you would see the libs use this tactic all of the time.Get someone who is innocent and sympathetic and use him to make a political statement.The crux of this is that the dems are trying to use this to get one step closer to socialized health care.Let me spell this out for you since you take everything at face value.The parents make 83,000 a year they chose not to get health insurance they are self employed.The republicans point is where does it end,do we offer free health care for poeople making 90,000 how about 200,000? See where this leading.Check your facts before you post what you think is true and stop believing everything you hear in the liberal leaning press.
2007-10-12 13:44:28
·
answer #7
·
answered by REAGAN REPUBLICAN 2
·
5⤊
2⤋
rush limbo knows how to make money does he not.......stur up the masses .......cause more devisions among the people.....pocket the green and go take a nap on an island some where.......and the poor folks will fight among themselves for cheap intertainment .....the trick is to shut off the t.v. on his channel.......don't give him your time or energy any more......infact just shut the t.v. off period and go for a walk in your community with real humans and find peace in them........non forgiving attack dogs......always cheap intertainment arin't they.....you are so right.......oh the market of the far right .....they sell your soul and then they put you in jail for being evil......need i say more......let me know and we will put it on foxey woxey and make the corporation sum more money
2007-10-12 14:07:12
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
HaHaHa! Good and decent in America! HaHaHa!
The ideology who exploits poor people and minorities,
the ideology who perverts Dr King's message of healing wounds by promoting opportunist race baiters like Jackson & Sharpton;
the ideology who screams about health care costs while promoting trial lawyers;
the ideology who has been hijacked by socialists and communists;
the ideology whose leaders are Teddy Kennedy- a felony manslaughter criminal; Byrd a former KKK leader; Clintons (pick one) shallow con artists- Billy being a superior grifter while sHrillery is a minor leaguer (that's why she needs him).
You despicable hypocrite, you have no right to talk about decency or condemn others while supporting your totally corrupt, false and worthless ideology.
2007-10-12 13:39:14
·
answer #9
·
answered by ? 7
·
7⤊
4⤋
Let those kids get J O B S!
Let their parents get a second J O B!!!!
2007-10-12 13:43:48
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋