2007-10-12 13:09:53 · 7 answers · asked by Chi Guy 5 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
They did not do their evil in the name of Saudi Arabia...they did it in the name of Islam.
Silly Chi Guy.
2007-10-13 11:06:48 · answer #1 · answered by ? 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Saudi Arabia kicked Osama OUT, along with many of his followers.
The royal family there has been fighting the same battle we have for a long time, trying to stop the Islamic fundamentalists from taking over.
My family lost some personal friends to this battle, several decades ago.
Turning against them WOULD be bigotry.
They turned against Osama a long time ago.
2007-10-12 13:26:20 · answer #2 · answered by mckenziecalhoun 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
The US invades dictatorships, countries harboring terrorists and human rights violators. However, if your guilty of all three like Saudi Arabia is but sit on a gigantic pool of petroleum, they become our friends.
2007-10-12 13:40:25 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
The hijackers aligned themselves with Bin Laden. He disassociated himself with the Saudis due to their ties with Americans. I assume the hijackers did the same.
2007-10-12 13:17:51 · answer #4 · answered by vegaswoman 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Oh yea. Sure. Hijackers has to come from some country. It was not the kingdom itself. I wonder if Saudi looks at us and thinks, Eric Rudolph, Tim McVeigh, and Charlie Manson?
2007-10-12 13:25:32 · answer #5 · answered by Slow Poke 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Hehe, the solutions listed below are noticeably stupid. Oil become the reason we did not invade Saudi Arabia, and Saudi Arabia has distinctive oil? I see what you're doing the following. you're taking conservatives' extraordinarily fraudulent case for warfare and making yet another case for protection pressure coverage both absurd. It would not look very useful. Comedians were doing this for years, so likely individuals are wearied by technique of this attitude with reference to the Iraq warfare. One mandatory piece of concepts that you received't comprehend, asker. Saddam made a sale of oil back in early November 2000, in basic terms he demanded euro's as a replace of funds. the quantity of oil offered become ridiculously small compared to international intake, and U.S. agencies offered up maximum of it...after scrambling to collect a pile of euros to pay for it. yet coverage/oil specialists on the time reported bluntly that Saddam had in basic terms led to the death of thousands and thousands of Iraqi voters by technique of this immediately ahead action. the actual reason behind warfare is in basic terms partly about the rather oil that runs all present day economies. the actual reason we pass to warfare in recent times is for overseas money manipulation. look up the petrodollar and discover out the way it props up the dollar's value, and also you'll have a non-partisan perspective to help evaluate the placement.
2016-10-21 01:47:26 · answer #6 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Does anyone need enemies?
2007-10-12 13:13:26 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋