This event was a symbol of the poor response to terrorism at the hands of the Clinton administration and a foreshadowing of the 9/11 attacks.
2007-10-12 12:06:10 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Longhaired- Have you figured out the meaning of "is"?
Funny that you would play with words when good men and innocent people die
2007-10-12 12:13:19 · update #1
OK... I can't even to begin to understand how a Bin Laden sanctioned attack on the USS Cole would not be viewed as a terrorist attack by "long haired freaky people"??? Are you kidding? This truly is the liberal mind hard at rest.
Avail... you really crack me up too... Osama was handed to Billy TWICE... and he opted to let him go.
Finally... "you can't claim this as a pre-cursor to 9/11"??? Uh... same group "testing the waters" here. Something small scale to see how we would react. Unfortunately we had someone in office who liked cigars more than this nation. We showed Bin Laden that we wouldn't do much. Too bad for Bin Laden a real President showed up before 9/11.
May God bless the families of those who were lost on the USS Cole.
2007-10-12 16:05:31 · answer #1 · answered by That Guy 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋
we could care who became the bomber or the launcher ???? Who know what bomb or missile hirt the united statescole. i might decide to renowned and we can know the instigator...... some poeple have been thinking that it became an exo 7 !!!!! and thus...... shooted by potential of a airplane. while each and all the administrations will comprehend that they risq extra to sale weapons alongside with final technology.....to any united states of america than go away loose the weapons and the cadriges for deers or shooters! We shouldn't look very far to renowned the dealer!
2016-10-22 04:58:17 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I feel for the sailors that lost their lives, but the bombing of the Cole was hardly a foreshadowing of the 9/11 attacks.
2007-10-12 12:13:13 · answer #3 · answered by just some chick 6 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Unfortunately, like the Whitewater scandal and the death associated with it... like the Lewinsky scandal and the lies associated with it... like the Bergman document theft and the questions still remaining about it...
the Liberals want to brush all it under a rug.
May those brave sailors never be forgotten.
2007-10-12 12:21:31 · answer #4 · answered by Bryan~ Unapologetic Conservative 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
This while Clinton was Tea Bagging the Intern?
2007-10-12 12:18:50 · answer #5 · answered by PNAC ~ Penelope 4 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Why would you use a tragedy to make a dig against Clinton?.... that is like when people say that 9/11 happened at the "hands of the Bush administration."
Stop using tragedies to make your political hateful statements... that is disgusting. People whose relatives that died on the Cole could be reading this.
2007-10-12 12:13:44 · answer #6 · answered by cattledog 7 · 1⤊ 4⤋
and Bush still has done nothing. Where is osama again? oh yeah, he isn't important.
Maybe Clinton should have scraped the suicide bomber up off the bottom of the ocean, and charged him with a crime aye??
Oh by the way, US COLE = military target, that was an act of war, not an act of terrorism.
If you would have paid attention, you would have known, that at least Clinton tried to kill Osama.
2007-10-12 12:13:18 · answer #7 · answered by avail_skillz 7 · 2⤊ 3⤋
i agree if Clinton would have done something anything after this the trade center may still be standing but instead he needed to hide his cigar instead of protecting the American people one more reason Clinton will go down as one of the worst presidents we have ever had
2007-10-12 12:14:51 · answer #8 · answered by gus1023 5 · 2⤊ 2⤋
thank you for the reminder,I will say a prayer for them.
2007-10-12 12:53:33 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
I doubt you'll hear much about this anniversary from
the liberal press and media.
2007-10-12 12:13:05 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 3⤋