… declare they want to establish worldwide caliphate.
Liberals led the charge in ignoring Hitler; they scoffed at him as they now scoff at the ability of the Islamists to succeed in their vision or more accurately, the vision of Mohammad. Liberals are now leading the charge at scoffing at the ability of the Islamists.
Everyone said Hitler didn’t have the military forces to fulfill his desires. They were a little off there weren’t they?
Radicals are gaining positions of power in Egypt, Turkey and elsewhere. They already have Iran and they want Afghanistan back. We might just give them Iraq.
What is it going to take to wake people up? You would have thought the effects of 9/11 would have lasted a little longer. I for one have not forgotten and I for one understand that OBL is just a small fish in the big lake of fanatics.
Do you remember the 1 or 2 people in the streets cheering when the towers went down?
2007-10-12
11:57:06
·
14 answers
·
asked by
Anonymous
in
Politics & Government
➔ Politics
Only problem is, there were not 1 or 2 or even 1000- 2000. There were millions of Muslims cheering and chanting death to America and burning our flags… remember?
2007-10-12
11:57:15 ·
update #1
Taco J - You are what we call a statistic.
2007-10-13
06:31:44 ·
update #2
Jared G - Agreed. why not? I will tell you why, OIL. So what's the point? Are you with us or not?
2007-10-13
06:32:33 ·
update #3
avail_skillz - In your attempts to belittle me, you come off as arrogant and what you state is contradictory to your intent…
2007-10-13
06:34:55 ·
update #4
jpenergy@sbcglobal.net – as is the norm, you are talking out of you’re rear. I checked my sources before I wrote that. I am not the one spinning here. "...You, my youth, are our nation's most precious guarantee for a great future, and you are destined to be the leaders of a glorious new order under the supremacy of National Socialism. Never forget that one day you will rule the world…"
- Adolf Hitler, 1938. http://www.militaryhistoryonline.com/wwii/articles/hitleryouth.aspx
This is one of many times were he announced his intentions.
2007-10-13
06:38:40 ·
update #5
Michael F - put the pipe down man, what you just wrote is totally irreverent.
2007-10-13
06:40:17 ·
update #6
G – you have seen me mention Saudi on many occasions. THEY ARE OUT ENEMY! Bush is sucking off of their oil, most political elites are their slaves…. What point are you trying to make?
2007-10-13
06:42:13 ·
update #7
Dogsnoop - What?
2007-10-13
06:42:46 ·
update #8
There is a difference.
When Churchill's rants over the military build up in Germany, FDR's concern over Crystal Nacht and warnings from the Soviets could no longer be ignored, the world turned to the strongest democracy for leadership, England. Neville Chamberlain took his liberal tush to Germany, kissed Hitler directly on the butt and declared "Peace In Our Time". The genocide of European Jews was written off as the cost of doing business.
From U boats sinking commercial vessels in the Gulf of Mexico and the North Atlantic to the surrender in Japan, over 500 Thousand American troops and civilians died along with 60 million people world wide.
It was the result of blissful ignorance and cowardice.
When the Americans finnally got involved the British said: "What took you so long Yanks?"
Democratic law makers, conducting all night sessions to develop a 'date-certain' for surrender in Iraq is more than ignorance.
It is a deliberate plan for appeasement that will not work.
When 9-11 happened, there were no troops in Iraq or Afghanistan. There were no carrier groups in the Gulf and Al Queda was in the United States.
I've heard it said: "We need another disaster to bring back the unity and patriotism we enjoyed after 9-11"
Well, we did have other disasters not the least of which were Katrina and 7-7 in England.
Instead of unity, the finger pointing blame game and the vitriol toward our leadership got worse.
Life as we knew it is over. We will never be the same.
Our enemy has embarked on a campaign of divide and conquer and they are gaining ground with every passing day.
Our democratic leadership has said quite clearly that the only way to fight the enemy morally is to do it on our own shores.
500 Thousand deaths will be looked upon as the good old days soon.
2007-10-12 23:55:26
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
i do think that we are headed into not, this tiny war we are in right now, but a fullsized facist war.me, being a former marine and nam combat vet can say that his war is not even close to what i call a regional-sized war.what i mean by this is what is taught in the naval war college, as conflicts are almost sized up in a similar state as a state high school basketball tournament(sectionals-regionals-semistate-state).we as a nation can not keep our heads in the sand forever, as we all feel, that sooner or later, rep. chuck rangel and general lute are going to speak out on exactly how large our military draft is going to be and just how few deferments will be in existence, probably after the next huge strike on american soil.
2007-10-12 12:42:50
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Unfortunately, we've gotten too complacent. WW III is coming and this time, it will not be fought on foreign soil. We think we are so safe, so secure, so happy go lucky, nothing can touch us. Well, people just don't realize how many near misses this country has had. And if the Dems keep messing around in Congress, we will all have hell to pay.
2007-10-12 12:10:41
·
answer #3
·
answered by Princess of the Realm 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
well... what are the differences between Hitler and Islamists?
the main one is technology and organization...
and why don't you mention Saudi Arabia... the Muslim homeland?
why does every conservative ignore the heart of the issue that they want to press so badly?
you want a crusade (which is clearly what you're implying)... IT STARTS IN SAUDI...
Ignoring Saudi is like ignoring Germany in WWII... it's the main funding point of all terrorist activities and the theological heart of the whole operation too?
and you say liberals ignore threats?
I don't agree with you... but even your own arguement is inconsistent...
2007-10-12 12:10:48
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
We should have learn our lesson from 9/11 and liberals want to bash Bush.
They want to think the problem will go away if we run away like we did after Blackhawk down.
It doesn't matter to liberals that women are stone to death for being rape or stone to death for adultry.
N.O.W. are more concern with making the right look bad.
The storm is coming I hope liberal will wake up and admit to the evil that is coming before nukes are denotated on US soil.
2007-10-12 13:18:46
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
2⤋
for what i remember(i`m out side Amerca ) most of the world including Muslims were shocked and horrified at what had happened .America had the worlds sympathy .over 9/11
its the American governments behaviour after 9/11 thats the problem why kill 700,000 Iraqis for something they had no part in and cause another 4 million to be displaced .thats 1 out of every 6 Iraqi families that have had to leave their home their livlihood and every thing behind them because of the fear of being killed
2007-10-12 12:27:19
·
answer #6
·
answered by keny 6
·
1⤊
2⤋
Ummm Saudi Arabia is Muslim and best friends of the Bush Family. The Majority of highjackers came from there yet Bush didn't invade.
2007-10-12 12:03:08
·
answer #7
·
answered by Jared G 5
·
1⤊
2⤋
And people like Anne Coulter want to convert the World, just like any Islamic extremist.
Osama the small fish in a big lake of fanatics??
Guy, Osama is the biggest financier of the worst terror attacks ever performed.
You take that guy out by feeding him, alive, to a bunch of hungry hogs, tape it and distribute it via the internet, guarantee other fanatics will think long and hard about following in his footsteps.
Your little speech/rant was touching, but the terrorists don't want you to forget either, because that is where they derive their power....their strength.
2007-10-12 12:04:04
·
answer #8
·
answered by avail_skillz 7
·
0⤊
4⤋
Probably the greatest harm done by vast wealth is the harm that we of moderate means do ourselves when we let the vices of envy and hatred enter deep into our own natures.
2007-10-12 12:07:50
·
answer #9
·
answered by Michael F 3
·
1⤊
1⤋
France and Britain are the ones who declared war.
2007-10-12 12:16:30
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
2⤋