2007-10-12 11:43:56 · 5 answers · asked by Strats!! 4 in Science & Mathematics ➔ Other - Science
Yes...whew what they did today sent me back into my coma...WE know its hotter we have a problem but when we make a movie about our environment and declare it as scientific proof and its not science but smoke and mirrors ...I want the atmosphere to clear up as much as anyone but by giving the PEACE prize to a guy who did a bad job of a scientific movie...Come on !!! I think they just didn't have anyone else to give it to that made an impact...We just don't have hero's anymore...well so much for the "PIECE " prize..I'm rather glad i had a chance at living in an Innocent time when war games were cowboys and Indians..and we had people like Roger Maris and JFK and MLK and Scott Carpenter..and Pavarotti...I'm through here...the E..
2007-10-12 12:07:54 · answer #1 · answered by Edesigner 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Absolutely not. Despite the fact that the award was named after the man who invented dynamite, the Nobel Peace Prize is valued to those who have positively impacted the Earth and its civilians.
2007-10-12 18:52:27 · answer #2 · answered by ɸ 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Yes, exactly how Glenn beck described it. i guess the only real reward is the actual work or action that they did. a prize or recognition isn't important
2007-10-12 18:56:06 · answer #3 · answered by falisrm 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Al Gore got one for what??? Perhaps he prevented Hilary from slicing Bill's throat over the Monica thing!!
2007-10-12 19:05:10 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Yeah!
the year they gave it to the biggest terrorist ever - Yassar Arafat
then followed up giving it to the worst US president
ever - Jimmy Carter.
2007-10-12 18:51:58 · answer #5 · answered by Bill 7 · 1⤊ 2⤋