Al Gore vs. Yassar Arafat. Who deserved the "Peace Prize" more?

Question

Yassar Arafats "peace" was very consistent with the teachings of the "religion of peace" (Quran 9:29 - Fight everyone who doesnt believe in Islam).

Al Gore's peacefully blamed America for a phenomena which the National Academy of Sciences said was potentially "less than 1% contributed by mankind".

Considering that all Americans (right and left) rallied against cholorflorcarbons when it wasnt politicized, one is left to ask "How unified would the world be, with respect to Global Warming, if Al Gore didnt politicize the issue, blame anyone in particular, tag on pet leftist issues, insert pathetic leftist morality into the debate, and just sought bi-partisan recogniztion, as with the chloroflorcarbons crisis?"

Westhill:

I read the conclusions of the National Academy of Sciences, and never ever did I find such a claim. Your parroting the outrageous leftist propaganda I refer to. Please feel free to show me otherwise with a link.

Answer 1

Let's see how to answer this without a violation...

Yasser Arafat subscribed to a religion invented by a terrorist pedophile. While there is not much evidence that Arafat was a pedophile or a rapist, he was every ounce the terrorist that Muhammad would have been proud of.

Al Gore is a complete buffoon and a tool. The claims in his movie had more holes than a Texas Whorehouse. "An Inconvenient Truth" has been rather easily debunked while most of it consisted of this shameful child-like ranting about how he "really won" the 2000 election.

Giving either one of these d!¢khedz a peace prize is like giving a peace prize to Adolph Hitler for "uniting Europe"

Answer 2

Al Gore certainly doesn't need the money reward portion of the Nobel Peace Prize, but relishes the fame it's brought him on his 2 man (his co-man of attack being David Suzuki) bandwagon to promote a healthier world. Unfortunately, Mr Gore is pounding a drum to one beat while living the tune of another. It's been stated by the likes of David Suzuki, and affirmed by Mr. Gore that if we don't do this or we don't do that, the world will basically disintegrate within the next 1000 years. Now I'm not sure about you, but I know for a fact , I'm to say the least, a tad bit sceptical of such a statement. Seeings as neither they nor us will be around in a thousand years proves only that to make such statements are unfounded and unsubstantiated. Why is it, that a man who couldn't be President continues to baffle the people with political hogwash? Not to say that the world is indeed in need of a major clean-up, and that polution matters are every one's concern, I find it amazing that we are now taking hold of this like it's a new issue. Polution control and matters of concern were with us in the 1940's when the industrialized world was taking shape. It further came to light in the 60's and 70's with the implimentation of additional taxes and requirements set forth by the governments to address the polution emitted by automobiles. Today's vehicles emit virtually none of the polution they did 30 years ago, yet they are the target by these hypocrites for a better breathing space. We continue to waste literally Billions of dollars annually on a war we can't win and to find water on planets that we'll never drink or use all the while being blindsided or baffled with the continual horse pucky of Over the top scientists and would be politicians. It's like the discovery of saccerine in the 60's as a sweetner substitue that was heralded as a miracle only to find out years later of the cancerous effects it had. Or, the discovery of a cough decongestant or cold capsule that that can be altered by a $10.00 application of things to produce the deadliest and most addictive drug in the world today. Although cleaning up the enviroment is indeed important, there are certainly many more health issues that take the front stage in our efforts to cure the ailments of today's society.

Answer 3

Obviously, the nobel peace prize no longer has merit. Makes ZERO sense that Al Gore got this.

What's next? Will Al Gore win the Heisman Trophy next year??

Answer 4

The only thing Yassir Arafat and Gore have in common is that they were both Jimmy Carter bottom boys.

Answer 5

Who deserved the peace prize more? Joseph Stalin, Adolph Hitler, Ghengis Khan, everyone in this forum, my two year old, my 6 week old, the neighbor's dog. Yeah everyone deserved the prize more.

Answer 6

Neither!


Gore is an idiot, he invented the internet and Arafat was a multi murderer. There was NOTHING about that man that was peaceful.

Answer 7

You fail to mention that Yitzhak Rabin and Shimon Peres also won in 1994, Nelson Mandela the year before, and the new conservative hero Aung San Suu Kyi of Burma a few years before that. Should they all be compared to Yassar Arfat too?

You also fail to mention that the National Academy of Science endorsed the theory of global warming. They are over 90% sure it is a problem caused by the activities of human kind.

Answer 8

The prize is an empty honor with no significance. The Norwegian socialists meaningless political opinions are just that.

Answer 9

You have done more to deserve the peace prize than either of them.

Answer 10

They both deserved it equally. It's a complete joke