Joint Custody?

Question

Does a man have the right to try and take his partner to court to obtain full custody of children instead of joint custody?

Married and getting divorced.
Neither have a drink or drug problem. Or mental health for that matter.

Answer 1

Of Course, but you have to prove to the court that you having full custody would be in the best interest of the children.

Answer 2

Yes, a man has a right to take his partner to court to obtain full custody. It depends on the circumstances, but most get joint custody.

Answer 3

joint custody isnt differnt than full on some levels the only good thing about joint custody is that if anything happens to the primary parent ,thenon primary parent gets controlof the child,but only if the primary parent hasnt left legal control of the child with someone else

Answer 4

In manhattan, in case you have "finished custody", you have only that finished custody. maximum human beings have joint custody, with one make certain being the custodial make certain. it extremely is fairly difficulty-loose. once you hear of visitation with the different make certain the different weekend and a pair of weeks in the process the summer time (now and returned regardless of after college days thrown in) it extremely is joint custody. The make certain who has the toddler (ren) the main, is the custodial make certain, however the different make certain has only as plenty suited to college records, scientific records and important alternatives. So extremely, are you searching for finished custody, or do you in common terms prefer to be the custodial make certain?

Answer 5

Yes he can. If he has concerns to the welfare of the children then he has that right.........If he is using this as just a threat to his partner then the courts will get to the bottom of it.....There is a whole process to go through before decisions are made...Mediation would be the first stage to try and get both parties agreeing to arrangements amicably for the benefit of the children.......

Answer 6

ONLY if you have reason that the mother is causing danger to the kids. All courts will put 50/50 custody over all. Best to share the children and get along

Answer 7

Its always best to have both parents, kids work best when there is no tension between you 2, if theres a remote chance you 2 can be civil, try for the kids. Unless there is abuse from her then you bet you can take full custody!

Answer 8

The children should always stay with their mother, unless the mother doesnt want the children or is an abusive mother or a severe drug addict that puts the children´s lives in danger. otherwise, the man should only ask for joint custody and let his children spend time and live with their mother since the mother is always usually the one who raises the children, takes care of them, feeds them, ect. kids need their mother, but they also need their father, if both of them agree they can have joint custody but in most cases its always like 60/40-mother always having the advantage.

Answer 9

He has the right but unless he can prove the mother is unfit it won't happen.

Joint does not mean 50/50. 50/50 is when the children live 50% of with each parent and most judges refuse to do this as it is very hard to work out.

Answer 10

Well if he has reason to believe that the mother would be an unfit mother to the children, and the children would be at risk, then he will have every right to do so.