English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

A particle travels between two parallel vertical walls separated by 11m. It moves toward the opposing wall at a constant rate of 6.3m/s. It hits the wall at the same height and the acceleration of gravity is 9.8m/s^2. How would I be able to find the speed of the particle when it hits the opposing wall and then how can I find at what angle with the wall will the particle strike?

2007-10-12 08:33:57 · 2 answers · asked by kira 2 in Science & Mathematics Physics

2 answers

The particle is falling as it move across the span between the walls. If it has an initial upward component to it's velocity, that can offset the fall. Now you know the horizontal distance and speed. So it takes;

t = d/vx = 11/6.3 =1.75 seconds to cross the 11 meters

At the opposite wall, the speed the ball goes down with must equal the speed it went up with at teh first wall otherwise it won't hit at the same height. So then:

v = v0 +at ---> -v 0 = v0 -gt where the final speed has a "-" sign bwecause it is point down.

Then: -2v0 = -gt ---> v0 = gt/2 = 9.8*1.75/2 =8.56 m/s

It makes an angle given by : q = arctan(-v0/vx) = arctan(-8.56/6/3) = -53.6 degrees below the hroizontal

2007-10-12 08:46:31 · answer #1 · answered by nyphdinmd 7 · 0 2

My trustworthy and earnest suggestion is which you're making an attempt to understand what that professor - and others - extremely reported earlier you're making any assumptions related to what can and might't be achieved. case in point, if the value of sunshine is persevering with - i.e. the photons pass you on the comparable velocity - no rely how briskly you pass, then how are you able to seize them? So while you're already shifting at ninety 9% of sunshine velocity, how are you able to get closer all those photons that pass you on the value of sunshine - relative to you? We already understand this - extremely it is fairly difficulty-loose physics. This replaced into not from a German professor, it replaced right into a Scottish professor, James Clerk Maxwell, and he revealed his outcomes contained in the 1860s - long earlier the German professor replaced into born. in case you do not understand the way this works, then you certainly possibly could, earlier you're making too many derogatory statements. extra: My factor is this: you may not get there via only including extra ability, or via making a larger accelerator. The physics would not paintings, and we already understand that. in case you have a extra useful thought, via all skill pursue it. yet pretending that the physics is incorrect - once you curiously do not are responsive to it to start with, only makes you look much less logical, and that may not an exceedingly sturdy thank you to commence up the attempt.

2016-10-06 14:00:30 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 1 0

fedest.com, questions and answers