2007-10-12 07:58:44 · 37 answers · asked by LordVader 4 in Family & Relationships ➔ Marriage & Divorce
Lust without love is usually the beginning of a relation when you meet someone and you both like each other. It is also the usual one night stand.
Love without lust can happen but is not good as you tend to get bored and it will end up in trouble.
I do not prefer either one. I am very happy being in my relation with my wife were we both have the greatest love and lots of lust as well.
As anything in this world, balance is a must.
2007-10-12 08:03:50 · answer #1 · answered by Dan D 5 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Lust without love. Then you can still be friends and do many things that a lot of married people do, but you don't have to worry about the rigors of love. If you love and don't lust then you can still be friends, but you end up being more like room mates. No passion and no lust makes everything boring. Of course you always want both, but it is true that sometimes it works out this way.
2007-10-12 08:29:16 · answer #2 · answered by No one 4 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Well I'm living proof of love without lust. I only need love and no lust is involved. Lust is a strong force in humans that makes us do stupid things that we will regret later on, but it's still necessary.
2007-10-12 10:08:53 · answer #3 · answered by Mythical Tales 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Long term? Both would have to be there...however initially all that's there is lust (love takes time to grow) and a lot of fun can still be had, but I'd like to know that love could eventually occur (and the lust be maintained).
2007-10-12 08:04:25 · answer #4 · answered by . 7 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Love without lust.
2007-10-12 08:22:10 · answer #5 · answered by S K 7 · 2⤊ 2⤋
Lust without love short-term, love without lust long-term.
2007-10-12 08:32:41 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
I want both. And I have both with my man. I think i will lust after him until the day I die, and I know I will love him until then.
I don't think you can truely have a fullfilling relationship without both love AND lust.
2007-10-12 08:28:02 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
love without lust. 3 months of ago i would of said lust without love, but im been thinking about my life and ive decided that im better than that. Love is truly more important to me, why? *smile* because Im worth it :)
2007-10-12 13:40:06 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
It starts with lust and moves to love. You can't have lust forever with someone. It gets old after a while.
2007-10-12 08:07:58 · answer #9 · answered by Simply Lovely 6 · 2⤊ 2⤋
Lust without love. Less complications. And love without lust is hard to imagine actually, I guess that is cuz I lust my husband (of course he is beastly sexy and 10 years younger than me and good in the sack and everywhere else). I always lust him but sometimes he is not very lovable so I am sticking with the lust, it keeps us working everything else out.
2007-10-12 08:10:10 · answer #10 · answered by scsspace 3 · 1⤊ 3⤋