2007-10-12 07:53:11 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
I never realized they had a category called: Hysterical hypocritcal Alarmist.
2007-10-12 07:56:10 · update #1
For the I feel sorry for the democrat/commies/terrorist so lets give em a prize like they did Arafat, honey.
2007-10-12 08:00:55 · answer #1 · answered by LoneStar 4 · 6⤊ 2⤋
Chief Nob Winner . As a consolation - Gorp couldn't qualify for physics or literature..so the best the 5 aristocratic socialist left voters from Sweden could give him -was "peace"..They must have stayed up all night thinking that one up.. to figure out how to vote for another socialist , using the "peace" ruse ..Apparently , the ruse was the only choice they had . Despite the ruling by a British court days ago -which further discredits the "Chief Nob Winner" - due to 11 errors they found in Britian alone ; and the fact that it was banned from schools ..along witrh countless scientic evidence which exposes Gore's movie . Gores propaganda film is really given credibility by the far left & the Hollywood elite , to further political agenda . The Global Warming legislation they propose , is greared to make life difficult for everyone - especially the poor ..so the socialist left can remain"elites" and dominate us peasants ; keep their paws in our wallets and in our homes & in our daily lives (which is what people like Gore; Clinton & the far left have in mind for Americans - while portraying themselves as saviors of us all , above God .
2007-10-12 08:46:28 · answer #2 · answered by missmayzie 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Al Gore won the Nobel Peace Prize. This choice, more than any other Nobel Committee selection, marks the end of a 105-year era. In direct contradiction of Alfred Nobel's last will and testament, the selection of Gore essentially means the Peace Prize can no longer be said to be an award for improving the condition of humankind. Looking at Gore's writing, it's far from clear that Gore even believes that humanity is his most important priority.
Gore does not even profess improving the human condition as his fundamental goal. Rather, his stated desire is to stop human activity that he sees as ruining what he calls the "ecosystem." Awarding the prize to Gore in 2007 is the equivalent of honoring the Luddites who tried to stop the beneficial technologies of Alfred Nobels's day.
2007-10-12 07:59:36 · answer #3 · answered by CaptainObvious 7 · 7⤊ 1⤋
Smoke & Mirrors category, following in the footsteps of Ziggi Wabashinksi and Yassar Arafat.
2007-10-12 08:01:50 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 1⤋
It was the Peace Prize, following in the big shoes of Martin Luther King and Nelson Mandela.
2007-10-12 07:57:25 · answer #5 · answered by rhino9joe 5 · 6⤊ 2⤋
Hypocracy
2007-10-12 08:06:13 · answer #6 · answered by booman17 7 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Largest weight gain in a fiscal year!
2007-10-12 09:26:45 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Lol, good one!
I'm still picking my brain as to why he won the "Peace" prize when he was talking about GW. Isn't that environmental?
2007-10-12 07:57:58 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋
Peace.
"Hysterical hypocritcal Alarmist"'s are those who still support The Presidents "reasons" for occupying Iraq.
2007-10-12 07:59:23 · answer #9 · answered by Think 1st 7 · 2⤊ 7⤋
Noble Peas.
Personally I think the Green Giant should have won.
RECOUNT!
2007-10-12 07:56:42 · answer #10 · answered by Major Deek 2 · 8⤊ 1⤋