I think so
She never has done anything noteworthy in her career. Those stars are for great people in the entertainment industry and she was never one of them.
2007-10-12 07:49:44 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous in Entertainment & Music ➔ Celebrities
They might as well give a star to Andy Dick
2007-10-12 07:57:13 · update #1
Heck yes. What the hell has she done that stands out from others like Mariah Carey, Beyonce, Christina Aguilera. Compared to their careers Britney's was just a blip on the radar screen. She's was trashy then and she's trashy now. Next time I go there I will look for it and spit on it! Trashy ho.
2007-10-12 07:55:04 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 0⤋
I think Brittany needs to live up to her star. I think she needs to figure out what is more important to her ... her career or her sons. From what I learned from the news recently, Brittany's ego is very fragile, and needs to feel that she is wanted. The more the media and paparazzi take pictures of her in clubs, out partying, with her gal pals like Paris etc., the more she feels needed. If the paparazzi stopped, she no longer would feel wanted. I guess her childhood was not a secure one. She no longer sees her parents or her sister. So, she does not have the family support she needs. Her relationship with the media is like that of a druggie who needs 'coke' to function.
Poor Brittany needs psychological help as well as help with the drugs, alcohol and parenting skills. If she does not get the correct help she needs, the star on the 'walk of fame' will be the only reminder we have of Brittany
2007-10-12 20:34:25 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think the star should be removed because yeah she doesn't deserve one at all right now.She needs to get her life in order and she's going t lose her career like that.Oh sorry her carrer is already over.Might as well,work as a stripper now,hey they pay good money for someone like her these days.
2007-10-12 15:24:31 · answer #3 · answered by Brittany Boo 4 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Yeah. It's too bad all it takes is for someone to pay money for someone to get a star. They used to mean something. Roger Moore just got one after his entire acting career, and Britney got one for what??? She can't sing, all she used to be able to do was dance, and now she can't even do that!
2007-10-12 14:52:54 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 1⤋
Please - there are so many non-stars on the Walk of Fame that it has become a joke. It used to be very prestigious to be there and now anyone can be on the Walk. It is ridiculous.
2007-10-12 14:53:30 · answer #5 · answered by ddot2882 6 · 5⤊ 0⤋
No I don't.Just because her life is in complete disarray right now,does not mean she should have it removed.
Many stars crumble under the pressures of being a Hollywood star,and most of them eventually clean up their act.
Besides,she paid for the star she has on the Hollywood walk of fame,it was not given to her.lol
2007-10-12 14:57:53 · answer #6 · answered by Candi Apples 7 · 0⤊ 4⤋
I think people missunderstand what the walk of fame is. It has nothing to do with their accomplishments. It is all PR. The person who nominated them into receiveing a walk of fame is also the person who has to pay a large fee to have the start put there. It is based on a small group of people who think she needs a star. Normally one gets one after they bring into millions into the entertainment community. Which she has!
2007-10-12 14:54:24 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 4⤋
I don't think that her star should be removed. She did contribute to the pop culture after all
BUt I do not agree with you that those stars are given only to great people. It seems like every day somebody gets a star. I think that the starwalk lost its meaning. Now it seems like you do one movie and you are given one.
And acctually I have seen a show on tv and if you have enough money you can buy yourself one.
2007-10-12 14:54:26 · answer #8 · answered by Malgorzata B 4 · 1⤊ 4⤋
Those stars are not for the "Greats" of the entertainment industry, they are for those who are willing to shell out the $25,000 "donation" fee.
But I do agree, she doesn't deserve one, unless it is for her portrayal of a drug and alcohol addicted idiot.
2007-10-12 14:52:33 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 1⤋
Does she really have one or are you making it up? If she has one, I didn't know that. If not, well, point taken. If she does, it should be taken, she hasn't done anything special. Unless we are giving out stars to drunken, druggie moms now.
2007-10-12 14:53:25 · answer #10 · answered by Nicole 4 · 4⤊ 1⤋