It goes like this.
The earth is on a very dangerous course due to losing mass. Year after year manking launches huge heavy doohickeys into space and thus decreases the mass of the earth. This has a direct consequence on reducing the force of gravity and thus will mean that someday the moon will drift away into the...uh..sunset.
Another consequence is the rotation of our planet will slow down through time and lengthen the day, thus forcing Hugo Chavez to decree himself President of Time Itself.
Won't you buy some Heavy Credits, for the children?
2007-10-12 07:34:13 · 11 answers · asked by Major Deek 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Readers of this post might be interested to learn that the earths' magnetic poles actually reverse every 100,000 years or so. ( no joke) But before they completely reverse they tend to wander further toward the equator. Knowing that the magnetic field surrounding earth is a major protection source of the Sun's solar rays (affected by the shape and intensity of the magnetic force) then it stands to reason that variation will occur naturally over time, leading to ice ages and times of higher heat, condensed water, and Co2 gasses in the environment. All with or without turning over the engine on your SUV.
2007-10-12 07:53:40 · answer #1 · answered by Rick A 3 · 2⤊ 0⤋
i won't be able to clarify it, and that i do no longer likely comprehend if there is something incorrect with it. i comprehend that once it grow to be first proposed, many atheist scientists did no longer like it because of the fact it sounded too very corresponding to creationism. earlier the huge Bang concept, they concept the universe grow to be eternal. Now, that's an generic concept, from what I hear. Why are scientists so petrified of something that could look like creation? isn't technological expertise a seek for reality, despite in case you do no longer in common terms like the undeniable fact which you detect?
2016-12-14 15:43:21 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
For the children? Yes I will buy your Heavy Credits.
2007-10-12 07:39:56 · answer #3 · answered by Yo it's Me 7 · 3⤊ 2⤋
Fine.
Now all you need to do is get 95 percent of the scientific community to accept your theory after a rigorous process of peer review.
2007-10-12 07:41:15 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 3⤋
Yes, it is for the children after all!!
2007-10-12 07:43:53 · answer #5 · answered by Supercell 5 · 3⤊ 1⤋
Ahhh yes, the children.
It's always all about the children.
2007-10-12 07:42:29 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋
The libs will buy it. They're gulliBULL.
2007-10-12 07:43:02 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋
"Do it for the KIDS!"
Signed,
Nancy Pelosi
2007-10-12 07:38:10 · answer #8 · answered by Kubla Con 4 · 4⤊ 2⤋
Sign me up, it's for the kids.........
2007-10-12 07:38:19 · answer #9 · answered by Brian 7 · 3⤊ 2⤋
Oh, please don't give albert any more big ideas. Arrgggh....
2007-10-12 07:39:08 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 2⤋