English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

No one is attacking or smearing Ronald McDonald, George Clooney, or Oprah Winfrey.

Ron Paul really scares these neo-Clowns, doesn't he?

Attack, attack, attack! (He's no threat.) Attack, attack, attack! (He's unelectable.) Attack, attack, attack! (Ron who?)

Do you freaks ALWAYS attack non-threats? Are you shooting at the shadows on the wall?

You look foolish, but keep attacking. Ron enjoys the exposure.
Just keep right on attacking that non-threat.

That tin-foil hat you're wearing may be distorting the Ron Paul 2008 Brain Beam. Take the foil off of your head, you'll be more comfortable.

2007-10-12 07:29:59 · 22 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Elections

22 answers

He reminds the rest of the Republicans that they are very far from their roots of being fiscal conservatives.

2007-10-12 07:38:51 · answer #1 · answered by aaronmk2 3 · 9 1

He maintains to be unelectable for now. Supporters have been particular he became gonna win in 2008 too. I see an identical enthusiasm. Time and time returned Ron Paul supporters ruled information superhighway sites and remained effective even with ever extra destructive odds against the guy. i individually don't comprehend what you're so happy approximately. Did he win an election? Get a nomination? end the media stereotype? Get the GOP to undertake any libertarian stance? Nope. it is basically yet another day the place Ron Paul is irrelevant while maximum human beings heavily evaluate politics as long as a results of fact the U. S. maintains to be what it truly is and allowed political discourse maintains to be firmly locked interior of limitations the organization has set, not by formal regulations that could desire to be fought, yet by media monopolies and many years of propaganda and indoctrination Ron Paul does not have of project in hell to win the nomination of the two company social gathering, not to point the White abode. while it truly is time to vote the generic public of the few human beings who nonetheless exercising that suitable are believers interior the equipment, subsequently genuine outsiders have a disadvantage The media could desire to truly outfitted Ron Paul and present him as electable, they decide for to not. They do it for somebody like Sarah Palin, why not Paul? by all her nonsense and open ridiculization Palin remains presented as a valid flesh presser or perhaps presidential candidate. Why??? Even company shops who invite Paul specially circumstances or oftentimes and look sympathetic constantly make it clean his techniques are too far out while it 'truly concerns'. they only placed him on and take care of him effective to objective to get well a number of his supporters into the equipment. The vote casting public follows. If all human beings who have been sufficiently previous voted outsiders might have a extra ideal shot i think of i don't see a reason to be happy. i think of realistically one or 2 can take place. Gop nominates incompetent neocon and Obama even with being disliked at that element wins the election besides as a results of fact the 'lesser evil' or the neocons are returned in can charge. They very own the two aspects and of those human beings that vote, returned that are actually not many, lots nonetheless purchase into the duopoly What sturdy is that poll?

2016-10-22 04:06:36 · answer #2 · answered by gustavo 4 · 0 0

He's the ONLY conservative in the race. Hey netjr, he doesn't blame you or me or the citizens of the U.S. for 9/11, he blames various administrations for their failed foreign policy, and he's right. Our imperialistic government allows the Islamofascists to easily recruit for terrorism.

Ron Paul is attacked because he speaks the truth, exposing our federal government for what they exactly are: a bunch of socialists and fascists who have the same goal in mind - to strip the freedoms away from the people until we are no longer citizens, but subjects.

2007-10-12 12:25:05 · answer #3 · answered by Brian R 3 · 2 1

You are probably not old enough to remember Pat Paulson, but he was probably the best candidate for President that has come up in over the last 35 years. I even voted for him in the last election, even though he has been dead for years.

2007-10-12 12:51:00 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

He is perceived as a threat to the republicans because if he runs as a third party he will take votes away from the republicans much the same way Ralph Nader took votes away from the Democrats in 2000.

I hope he runs.

2007-10-12 07:54:46 · answer #5 · answered by courage 6 · 0 3

WHO is attacking him? What is a neo-Clown? Who are freaks? Do you have anyone specific or is this just campaign rhetoric?
Do you feel better now that you have ranted?

2007-10-12 08:52:25 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

You know at first I thought the average Joe Q. American was smart enough to distinguish obvious political smeer tactics & out-right lies from the truth.....but apparently only the clear headed un-biased, un-flappable, open minded, patriotic types af Americans are.

Could it be a huge majority of Americans cannot read & write anything but slander, without distorting facts???

Ron Paul is very simply a "TRUE" AMERICAN,,,Constitutionalist, trying to save the USA from the grips of Tyranny,,,,,,,and sadly many Americans will not accept this fact.
Thank you for the question.
*********************************************************

2007-10-12 07:52:34 · answer #7 · answered by beesting 6 · 3 2

the truth , shines a light in the dark of night , to reveal the machinations of truly evil men

and the evil men are who have been running our country in the ground. time to take the country back from the few back into the hands of the citizens.

Ron Paul 08'
the only wasted vote is for the status quo

vote 3rd party
the republicans and Democrats are truly failed parties, and need to be cast to the side they are not salvageable

2007-10-12 07:38:04 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 6 2

Actually, Ron Paul has a lot of support simply because he is so different from the other Republican candidates. Reminds me a bit of the movie, Man of the Year. No electronic voting fraud to bring him into office, though... sorry...

2007-10-12 07:38:02 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 4 3

I've heard his ideas are well received by many Republicans but that his mannerisms keep him from being a real political candidate.

2007-10-12 08:07:55 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

fedest.com, questions and answers