Ann Coulter is the dumbest, educated person i have ever heard. On Donny Deutsch's "Big Idea" CNBC show she said essentially that Jews should become Christians so they can become "perfected."
She puts Republicans to shame.
She's also said the following:
The "backbone of the Democratic Party" is a "typical fat, implacable welfare recipient"---syndicated column 10/29/99
To a disabled Vietnam vet: "People like you caused us to lose that war."---MSNBC
"I think there should be a literacy test and a poll tax for people to vote."---Hannity & Colmes, 8/17/99
"I think [women] should be armed but should not [be allowed to] vote."---Politically Incorrect, 2/26/01
"I think we had enough laws about the turn-of-the-century. We don't need any more." Asked how far back would she go to repeal laws, she replied, "Well, before the New Deal...[The Emancipation Proclamation] would be a good start."---Politically Incorrect 5/7/97
2007-10-12 07:29:30 · 26 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
source: http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/features/2001/0111.coulterwisdom.html
2007-10-12 07:39:03 · update #1
Ann Coulter lives because we give her life with our attention and outrage. If we'd only ignored her when she first crawled from the egg and ate her parents, her 15 minutes wouldn't have outlasted a single up-and-down of her Adam's apple.
The ironic thing is that she doesn't have any real support, as she represents a faction of society that actually desires to oppress women, and which deep down, really resents her, and will in the end reject her.
2007-10-12 07:38:19 · answer #1 · answered by Juniper McClintock 4 · 4⤊ 2⤋
on the different hand the previous asserting " you won't be able to pay for exposure like this" could observe here. no longer that the message that she tried to make on the subject of John Edwards grow to be something new. however the exposure her verbal substitute with Mrs. Edwards appeared disgrace finished to me. Mrs Edwards suggested that she grow to be calling on the subject of her ineffective son, and Ann Coulter did no longer renowned that. She immediately went on the political protecting and made the assertion that John Edwards could desire to be the only to place the call. as quickly as returned focusing in on politics. as a techniques because of the fact the 9/11 widows are worried, i'm confident that a reliable part of the law enforcement officials and firefighters who died that day have been conservatives. Ann Coulter paints with too super of a broom for my section. If that's mainstream, it ought to sending the incorrect message to those who have not desperate what edge of the political fence they go with to be on.
2016-12-14 15:42:47 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I don't agree with Ann all of the time, but what she says about Jews doesn't offend me near as much as what Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton and Louis Farrakhan say about them.
I don't agree with her belief that we need a literacy test for voters. I think limiting voting to people with Honorable Discharges would be better.
The Emancipation Proclamation was not, in reality, what most people think it was. It didn't free ANYONE. It's effects were to free slaves from Confederate territory taken over in the future. It was intended as pure propaganda, and it succeeded as pure propaganda.
2007-10-12 07:41:32 · answer #3 · answered by open4one 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Hey don't worry too much she is just practicing the FREEDOM OF SPEECH nothing else.
Nobody will make me change my mind the way I think so Conservatives or Liberals are all the same to me.
I do listen but I don't never take it personal...
Is just waist of time going crazy about peoples opinion.
2007-10-12 07:39:05 · answer #4 · answered by nena_en_austin 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Every now and then, she says something to p*ss off a group of people to keep her name in the papers. I think she's running out of groups. Catholics are next.
2007-10-13 00:53:23 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Why is it that liberals can quote Bill O'Rielly and Ann Coulter chapter and verse while conservatives can't?
Paradoxical.
2007-10-12 07:38:01 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
she doesn't rule my opinion.. i do agree with her way of thinking some of the time..
but then again.. anyone can take a statement out of context and phase it in a way that is not what the speaker had intended...
this is done on both the left and the right..
but i see the left doing it more then the right does
2007-10-12 07:51:09 · answer #7 · answered by pokerfaces55 5 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Why do "we" LET her?
Last I checked it is a free country and everyone (even idiots) have the right to say what they want.
Very open minded of you to want to remove others rights just because you don't like what they say.
Let me guess... You are a "Liberal" right? Liberals always TALK about rights for everyone yet they are the ones trying to take them away.
2007-10-12 07:35:14 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋
Yes she says things that most of the Hard working Americans are thinking but some how never gets asked about by Liberal poll takers
2007-10-12 07:36:24 · answer #9 · answered by tap158 4 · 3⤊ 3⤋
Not to bash your party, but the new deal and the emancipation proclimation are not the same thing, as implied by you. FDR and Lincon are pretty far apart.
2007-10-12 07:34:23 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 2⤋