Realistically, and honestly, the movie was not filled with inaccuracy's
2007-10-12 07:28:18
·
answer #1
·
answered by bgee2001ca 7
·
1⤊
1⤋
Gore's movie has some inaccuracies, however not as many the right wants you to believe. We are still in danger because we are destroying the earth. If Gore's movie has any impact on slowing or ending global warming, then it will have stopped countless wars that would start in the future do to lack of resources.
2007-10-12 07:32:01
·
answer #2
·
answered by aaronmk2 3
·
0⤊
1⤋
ONE so called expert in UK says there were inaccuracies and that counters the thousands of scientists that agree with him? Wow what power one scientist must have. Even Albert Einstein didn't wield that much power.
2007-10-12 08:23:22
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
it's as accurate as yessir ararat getting the "peace prize" when that aids infected rat was responsible for the murders of thousands of Israelis around the world.
nobel prizes outside the science field are 100% political and a complete joke.
2007-10-12 07:36:30
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
An "Inconvenient Truth" is NOT full of inaccuracies... it is being attacked by those same stupid people who insist that Global Warming is not real... it is the ATTACKERS who are full of inaccuracies.
2007-10-12 07:32:54
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
2⤋
I would say that at the very least the decision to give him the prize was very politicized.
2007-10-12 07:27:49
·
answer #6
·
answered by Sam 3
·
3⤊
0⤋
Who the hell nominated Rush Limbaugh? Some equally drugged up fat guy?
2016-05-22 02:32:44
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yes.
His war ended Rambo's "War on Drugs!"
2007-10-12 07:43:09
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
They gave one to Arafat, nuff said.
2007-10-12 16:30:11
·
answer #9
·
answered by smsmith500 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
I was wondering that myself. And if anything it has actually stirred up more trouble.
2007-10-12 07:31:06
·
answer #10
·
answered by Yo it's Me 7
·
2⤊
1⤋