2007-10-12 07:13:16 · 18 answers · asked by shaneallen04 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Yep. I voted for him when he beat Bush by app. 500,000 votes in 2000. The no's you're getting here are from the 25%'s that wouldn't vote for a Democrat no matter who it was. I can understand that from the die-hards but what I don't understand is the vehement hatred for Gore. Other than his stand on global warming, I doubt there are 10% of people on this board that know what his stand on other issues are. Typical blind neocon hatred.
2007-10-12 07:34:41 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Odd how the media has only given passing attention to a New Zealand think tank saying the Academy Award should be taken away and that a British High Court found 11 falsehoods in "The Inconvenient Truth" and labeled it as "alarmist". Then again 1/2 truths are the norm for politicians now days.
So, no, I wouldn't vote for him and if he received the Democratic nomination it would once again give the Republicans the White House.
2007-10-12 07:28:39 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
NO..... I'm a life long republican hoping the democrats will offer me a legitimate candidtae to vote for....Al Gore is not a legitimate canddidate..... the democrats will never win the whitehouse again if they keep giving us the KERRY's and Gores of the world.....how about someone a little closer to center?
2007-10-12 07:17:47 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
I've been a "Gore-head" since the late 80s. Kinda funny, Gore goes on to be one of the most respected people around the world and Bush goes on to be one of the most hated people around the world. Wouldn't it be nice to get back to other countries liking the good old USA
2007-10-12 07:19:27 · answer #4 · answered by Michael G 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
i'm no longer unavoidably a liberal or conservative. yet the place did Dick Cheney make plenty money that he can donate incredibly much 7M. i think of the authentic question might desire to be how plenty has Dick Cheney profited on condition that starting to be vice chairman whilst in comparison with all different VPs. regardless of each and every little thing if I make 20 money and donate 10, then i'm greater beneficiant that the guy who makes a hundred yet donates 20 am I no longer ?
2016-11-08 03:03:25 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
No, him winning does not take away from the fact he gave an anti American speech on foreign soil. When he was undercutting Bush in Saudi Arabia he was pretty much giving an al queda recruitment speech, he doesn't deserve the highest office.
2007-10-12 07:19:21 · answer #6 · answered by JFra472449 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I would Vote, contribute, and work for Al Gore to become President.
2007-10-12 07:17:03 · answer #7 · answered by bgee2001ca 7 · 2⤊ 2⤋
I wouldn't vote for him for president of my fifth grade class (if I was still in that 5th grade). I appreciate his efforts on global warming and discovering the Internet, but president? LOL
2007-10-12 07:20:37 · answer #8 · answered by SgtMoto 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No and most people won't either. We are smart enough to see this for the PR that it is , I mean even a Gore supporting can admit that Global Warming has ZERO to do with a Peace Prize
2007-10-12 07:16:59 · answer #9 · answered by TyranusXX 6 · 2⤊ 2⤋
NO! If the majority people of his HOME state don't think enough of him to vote for him over George Bush why would I. They know him better than I do.
2007-10-12 07:17:29 · answer #10 · answered by namsaev 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋