Schools, hospitals have been built in Iraq. Basra has peace. Ofcourse he got rid of the most evil Tyrant since Adolf Hitler. He stopped continued genocide and chemical mass murder of the Iraqi people by Hussein.
He also gave billions to Africa for AIDS.
Im sick to my stomach
2007-10-12 07:03:55 · 45 answers · asked by trinity 1 in News & Events ➔ Current Events
Its a bit hard to give him the Peace prize when the means he chose was war.
2007-10-12 07:06:37 · answer #1 · answered by Johnny 7 · 16⤊ 3⤋
Get real the Americans helped put Sadam in power in the first place, and where do you think he got the chemical weapons to use, from dear old uncle sam of course. The death toll of doctors in Iraq is in excess of 2000. They would be treating patients if dear old uncle sam hadn`t stuck his big nose in.
More people have disapeared and died in Iraq since the removal of Sadam than did during his riegn of terror. That to most right thinking people of the rest of the world makes uncle sam the biggest terrorist the world has ever known.
Being that American pharaceutical companies are making imoral profit on drugs to treat Aids I think it only right that American taxes help the poorest people in the world to get that treatment.
Look at the damage your country is doing in an attempt to control other peoples oil, before you suggest that a meddlermaniac, warmunger has any incline of what peace is let alone deserve a medal for it.
2007-10-12 12:48:55 · answer #2 · answered by Terry M 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋
I think it is bacause he did not get rid of Sddam peacfully, and although the millions he gave to Africa for aids treatment was just a drop in the bucket compared to what was requested and even less than what was needed. People only get the Nobel peace prize for doing something outstanding to try to bring peace to an embattled area of the world, or trying to very diligently, or have suffered much at the hand of an oppressor and brought freedom to a people. The Nobel prize is for outstanding actions in the face of great adversity. However, basing Bush's popularity on a war is stupidity. What do the American people think, that a democracy can be created in or 5 years. Even in the united states the declaration of independence was signed in 1776, and the Constitution did not come along untill 1787. We are also not governed by the same kind of men. America's founders and freedom fighters, a great number of them, lost everything in fighting for this country's freedom. Today both republicans and democrats have no idea what self sacrifice in the service of their country is. i think "W" deserves a great deal of credit for sacrificing his popularity to help the people of Iraq to gain their freedom from tyrany
2007-10-12 07:24:21 · answer #3 · answered by Michael W 2 · 3⤊ 2⤋
Lol YOU GOTTA BE KIDDING? 1st off, if Basra has peace its b/c the BRITS were in change there NOT the Americans... 2nd Hussein was a horrible guy but at least he kept the country running and there was no civil war. Don't get me wrong, he was a bad guy but NOT the worst in the world... He was just a Tryant with a lot of oil that Bush knew we could topple take... Hind sight being 20/20 he never would have removed Saddam...
2007-10-12 07:52:08 · answer #4 · answered by beau0021 3 · 2⤊ 3⤋
this is a trick question right?give peace prize to a person who goes to war without the united nation approval and tells lies to justify invading iraq.hussein biggest tyrant since hitler?have you ever heard of idi amin?
bush is responsible for more iraqi deaths that sadam ever was and bush didnt give billions to africa to fight aides....america did because it wasnt bush's money.
2007-10-12 11:10:02 · answer #5 · answered by #1 NFL FAN 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I hope you aren't serious. Yes, Saddam Hussein was an evil tyrant, but so are many others the US government supports.
Those who win the peace prize don't do it by waging war:
see the list for the winners.
http://www.nobelprizes.com/nobel/peace/peace.html
2007-10-12 07:19:44 · answer #6 · answered by emenbensma 4 · 1⤊ 2⤋
But then again Bush has not been in favor with some of the people in America. And he started a war. I dont think you get a nobel PEACE prize for that.
2007-10-12 07:35:15 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
Bush didn't get rid of AIDS. Don't forget that he got rid of Saddam because his Father let him go. George Bush also started a War. You don't get a Nobel Prize once you have started a war. He would have to do something about his 70% disapproval ratings in order to get a Nobel Prize. Don't hold your beath waiting. Building support for the Bush Presidency is like whipping a dead horse.
2007-10-12 07:12:30 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 3⤋
Absolute rubbish! Thousands and thousands of men women and children have been killed since the illegal overthrown of Saddam Hussein. That's more than Saddam Hussein did during his reign.
The Americans are illegally taking oil barrels by the minute and were has all the missing billions of dollars gone after the so called war???? .
2007-10-12 07:47:51 · answer #9 · answered by puffcandy007 3 · 1⤊ 2⤋
How about because mass murdering war criminal G W 'draft dodger' Bush has killed at least 600,000 innocent Iraqi civilians in the process, and Nobel was a peaceful Norwegian rather that a warmongering American no-brainer.
That just about answers it for you. But I would advise you to read a bit more on the subject... preferably non-American gung ho right wing newspapers.
2007-10-12 07:19:08 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 3⤋
what billions did he give to africa for aids. i know he promised it but as far as i know it has not been passed through the senate at all in fact he has not brought the bill to congress so wheres the money peace boy bush. as for a tyrant in iraq, of course he was and you know who made him the CIA
2007-10-12 07:43:42 · answer #11 · answered by BUST TO UTOPIA 6 · 1⤊ 2⤋