2007-10-12 06:53:44 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Elections
Without hesitation, I would.
2007-10-12 06:54:19 · update #1
Yes.
2007-10-12 06:59:24 · answer #1 · answered by commonsense 5 · 2⤊ 1⤋
i've got have been given faith his thinking is larger alongside the strains of bill Clinton... only as bill ought to be the ambassador to the international jointly as Hillary gets elected, i think of of Al believes that with each and every of the drum beating taking place that the ambience is approximately to be the social mechanism to point us with the international, a brilliant redistribution of our factors (money) which will put in line with diverse 0.33 international international places... Russia, China, globalism could be each and every of the rage, and Al sees him utilising actuality the only genuine guy or woman to oversee the carried out ingredient... so it's going to be a brilliant ego contest between the two Clintons and Gore to proportion the spotlight.
2016-11-08 03:01:27 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I would strongly consider it, but it seems very unlikely. Mr Gore has discovered that he can have far more influence outside of the government than trying to get things done within the constraints of the political system. I foresee him accepting "Ambassador at Large" roles for President Clinton where he can enjoy the best of both worlds, but I don't think he'll run again for elective office.
2007-10-12 06:59:13 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋
I wish he'd run. Not only would he be a great president, but he chose to surround himself with great people. and get this great counrty back on track.
not like these lap dogs GW has brought in. even the most abused dog wil bite back, hence all the ones that have left him.
Clinton would also make a good president, but I'm voting for Edwards.
2007-10-12 07:05:47 · answer #4 · answered by zzyzx08 3 · 1⤊ 2⤋
obama in the primary!
but gore over any republican
well except for maybe ron paul of course!
2007-10-12 07:17:09 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Not a chance. Plus, the man strives for attention, believe or disbelieve in his opinions no one can truly say that this guy does not seek attention, he's proven that time and time again. Oh ya, money also. He is just getting too much of that in his current stage of life to change that.
2007-10-12 07:05:18 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
Of course not. Anyone who would create such a commotion over losing an election fairly, then build another whole career on scare tactics about the idiotic idea of Global Warming being caused by man, using a video full of untruths,is not one I would want in charge of the country.
2007-10-12 06:59:41 · answer #7 · answered by Wiz 7 · 1⤊ 4⤋
Quote from earlier post ...
"not a chance! Besides, I'm a registered republican so I can't vote for him, even if I wanted to."
Doesn't doing this seem like a dumb idea? Limiting your options on who your able to vote for!!! So dumb if you ask me.
2007-10-12 07:06:21 · answer #8 · answered by Jerbson 5 · 1⤊ 2⤋
To pull votes from Rodham, hell yes.
2007-10-12 07:06:08 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
No, he's a commie, pinko liberal tree huggin' environMENTAL wackjob who just won the peace prize for his efforts on the fraudulent science known as climate change. Global warming, what's wrong with that; it's been happening for years!
JK ;>)
2007-10-12 07:00:25 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋