Don't you think he should at least get a nomination for his declaration of a war on terrorism, making everybody safer and bringing peace to the Middle-East. >sarcasm<
2007-10-12 06:17:51 · 26 answers · asked by Enigma 6 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
LOL, ROFL.....Yes for his uncanny ability to dodge work, and for his astounding ability to never be held accountable for anything, for his duplicitous position on murder (adults and foreign children- yes, American fetuses- no), for his creation of a new dialect of the English language, Getting into Yale with 2.5 GPA, and most importantly his refusal to even attend Air National Guard meetings due to his objections (ie. his cocaine was cut with cheap soap :) ) History will not only judge him as one of the WORST presidents ever, but also one of the worst leaders in the world ever, he is an absolutely corrupt, incompetent MORON!!!
2007-10-12 11:27:00 · answer #1 · answered by HP 4 · 2⤊ 0⤋
That's more than anyone else has done and as a result Islamic terrorism has been a growing and serious problem through out the world for decades. I'll refer you to the events in Russia, Germany, Italy, Spain, Denmark, France, Great Britain and half a dozen other countries around the world. This is an inconvenient truth that folks like you seem to constantly dismiss. And now that they've gotten into the practice of flying planes into buildings killing not a few but thousands, don't you think someone should do something to protect, at the very least, America from this threat?
Tell ya what. If Al Gore went over there and convinced the murdering psychopaths that we're fighting all over the world that maybe they shouldn't have little Enigma in their cross hairs, then I'll respect him. Until he does, until he puts even a toe on the line, I'd vote for Bush any day of the week where the question of peace is raised. NO ONE is doing more to secure it...despite the best efforts of folks like you.
2007-10-12 06:29:17 · answer #2 · answered by The emperor has no clothes 7 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Yeah what they need is the opposite of the Nobel for people like Bush (although the Nobel is a joke really just political Al Gore for god's sake!) how about the Nobel most selfish, inhuman psychopath of the year award? Bush might win that although Rumfeld and Cheney could beat him to it.
2007-10-12 06:27:19 · answer #3 · answered by airmonkey1001 4 · 3⤊ 1⤋
Yes. The Nobel for Special Achievement in Government. For being the highest ranking official ever to participate in the Special Olympics.
2007-10-12 06:25:53 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
Blackwater too, should get nomination at least, for bringing pieces... Sorry no peace here, but I guess its the same in this case!
2007-10-12 12:22:36 · answer #5 · answered by Jedi squirrels 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I think there is a Nobel Brush Clearing Prize...
Sorry I couldn't resist.
2007-10-12 06:28:01 · answer #6 · answered by cattledog 7 · 3⤊ 0⤋
Maybe if they make a sub-category, like the Nobel genocide prize. He would definitely win that! He's the best president we have ever had when it comes to KILLING!
2007-10-12 06:52:27 · answer #7 · answered by stonehouse421 2 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Based on what?
Waging a war of aggression on a non-threatening sovereign nation?
Yeah - I'll bet that scores really high with the Nobel committee!
2007-10-12 06:22:01 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 6⤊ 1⤋
I don't think that's a club he'd want to join considering pervious members.
As far as terrorism in your question, Nobel PP awarded Arafat, a well-known terrorist. And you insult someone who finally said no to the terrorists. You're a big terrorist supporter I guess.
2007-10-12 06:29:12 · answer #9 · answered by pgb 4 · 0⤊ 2⤋
I would pray not, however my prayers for the last 7 years have gone unanswered so....maybe there are enough kooks out there that would nominate him...but I still think the balance of the world views the cowboy for what he is and are not fooled one bit.
2007-10-12 06:25:43 · answer #10 · answered by malter 5 · 4⤊ 2⤋