2007-10-12 06:11:28 · 6 answers · asked by captbullshot 5 in Arts & Humanities ➔ Books & Authors
Oh hell yeah... I'd like to be her when I grow up. She tells people what she thinks straight up, neat, even though she's been criticized as "strident and eccentric" for it.
Not to mention that her work can change lives, or at least influence them greatly. What better reason to be a winner of the Nobel Prize?
2007-10-12 06:25:52 · answer #1 · answered by Holly 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
You don't vote for Nobels.
But she has been an interesting and thought-provoking author for more than 50 years. Her science-fiction output, particularly the Canopus in Argos series, explored some fascinating philosophical themes.
2007-10-13 00:33:37 · answer #2 · answered by Daniel R 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes. If for nothing else, then for her history as an anti-apartheid campaigner.
2007-10-12 06:15:24 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Yes, she is an interesting and refined woman.
2007-10-12 06:43:52 · answer #4 · answered by Mr. Graham 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
No
2007-10-12 06:17:36 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
absolutely!
2007-10-12 06:55:12 · answer #6 · answered by sounditout 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋