How Much Are We Going To Hear About The Nobel Prize Committee's?

Question

Decision to overlook these errors in Al Gore's BS documentary?

The film claims that melting snows on Mount Kilimanjaro evidence global warming. The Government's expert was forced to concede that this is not correct.

The film suggests that evidence from ice cores proves that rising CO2 causes temperature increases over 650,000 years. The Court found that the film was misleading: over that period the rises in CO2 lagged behind the temperature rises by 800-2000 years.

The film uses emotive images of Hurricane Katrina and suggests that this has been caused by global warming. The Government's expert had to accept that it was "not possible" to attribute one-off events to global warming.

The film shows the drying up of Lake Chad and claims that this was caused by global warming. The Government's expert had to accept that this was not the case.

The film claims that a study showed that polar bears had drowned due to disappearing arctic ice. It turned out that Mr Gore had misread the study: in fact four polar bears drowned and this was because of a particularly violent storm.
The film threatens that global warming could stop the Gulf Stream throwing Europe into an ice age: the Claimant's evidence was that this was a scientific impossibility.
The film blames global warming for species losses including coral reef bleaching. The Government could not find any evidence to support this claim.
The film suggests that the Greenland ice covering could melt causing sea levels to rise dangerously. The evidence is that Greenland will not melt for millennia.
The film suggests that the Antarctic ice covering is melting, the evidence was that it is in fact increasing.

The film suggests that sea levels could rise by 7m causing the displacement of millions of people. In fact the evidence is that sea levels are expected to rise by about 40cm over the next hundred years and that there is no such threat of massive migration.

The film claims that rising sea levels has caused the evacuation of certain Pacific islands to New Zealand. The Government are unable to substantiate this and the Court observed that this appears to be a false claim.

http://newsbusters.org/blogs/noel-sheppard/2007/10/09/court-identifies-eleven-inaccuracies-al-gore-s-inconvenient-truth

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/education/7037671.stm

Answer 1

Makes the Nobel Prize not so elite and prestigious, anymore.

Answer 2

Yawn.......

I saw the errors in Gore's documentary first hand by actually seeing the movie and not rehashing someone elses commentary over and over and over again.

I don't care about the Nobel prize, nor do I care if Gore won.

Maybe you shouldn't either.

Answer 3

A judge in the UK ruled that Gore had 9 MAJOR LIES in his film.

Answer 4

There is only one thing we need to hear about them. If you're a Conservative, you'll never win the prize.

Answer 5

Al : i asked the same question bcoz i just got fed up with it. i asked a question mostly for fun an laughter. please read it if you get a chance.

Best Regards.

Peace lover is an appropriate name for you son?! you are saturated with love and peace!!

Answer 6

All day, maybe some early tomorrow, but after that, probably never again

Answer 7

This film was just a money making ploy.

Answer 8

Silly boy... FACTS ARE NO LONGER VALUABLE IN SCIENCE.... they have now been caught up in the "hollywood" hype. It is now a popularity contest.

Answer 9

It gives people something to RANT about - huh? :)

I hope it goes on for days!

Answer 10

For days maybe months , the lib biased Media is loving this. shyster's lies!!