Al Gore won the 2000 election, but the GOP-controlled Supreme Court threw
out 175,000 never-counted votes in Florida so they could appoint George
Bush.
Over the past 7 years, Bush has unleashed death and destruction upon
America and the world, while Al Gore has worked tirelessly to save the
planet.
We urgently need to put Al Gore in the White House for the sake of
ourselves, our children, and our grandchildren.
Run Al Gore!
2007-10-12 04:35:06 · 30 answers · asked by courage 6 in Politics & Government ➔ Elections
Yes, I'd vote for Al Gore.
He brings international respect back to the White House.
He is not as polarizing as Hillary and Obama. He will do a better job at bringing this country back together again.
He has a long successful history in congress as a national leader.
He is intelligent.
He places a high value on technology and the environment which is something we desperately need now.
He should get into the race and he not make any mention of losing the previous election to the Supreme Court. He should run on today's issues, emphasis on the environment, technology, and a better running government. Al Gore's the man!
2007-10-12 06:51:56 · answer #1 · answered by Dr. D 7 · 3⤊ 0⤋
Look at all these Right Wing Zombies responding to this question.
The Democrats and Republicans don't have a lesser of two evils this election. Both parties don't have much going for them.
Yes, Al Gore should run. People are afraid of change. People can;t understand what he says because they fear to accept something they do not know.
He was robbed in 98 and should give it another shot.
I'd like to know all the haters who put down Gore give some reasons to support Giuliani. What has this man done to show he can run a country? He was a mayor, that's a different animal compared to the entire nation.
2007-10-12 05:13:25 · answer #2 · answered by ItsMeTrev 4 · 2⤊ 0⤋
I hope Gore runs, but I doubt he will. He and Mrs. Clinton are too close as friends to go head to head. However, as a conservative, my mantra is "ABC - Anyone But Clinton", and I'd much rather face a near-certain prospect of four years of Al Gore than a fifty/fifty prospect of Mrs. Clinton in the White House.
Also, I go by the beer rule -- which candidate would I rather have a beer with, and Al Gore tops the list. Even over the idiots on the Republican side of the ballot whom I'd presumably vote for.
There, that should get me plenty of thumbs-down from both sides of the aisle!
2007-10-13 06:10:13 · answer #3 · answered by trentrockport 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Oh YES, he should run, that way he can LOSE a second time! BONUS he could invent even more marvels like the internet! Just think what classic novels could then be written, one that would beat The Love Story. Have you read his book? That's right, I can't wait to get rid of these pesky cars, refrigerators, air conditioners, aerosol cans etc. I LOVE living in the 18th century! RIGHT ON! Totally disregard the fact that the world's most prestigious scientist including the man who actually coined the term "Global Warming" now says it's princibles are flawed and there is NO SUCH THING! I warmly remember growing up and scientists were warning us all of Global FREEZING, I was a teen and scarred to death, having to live underground. Grow up, learn a little.
2007-10-12 04:48:12 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 2⤋
Sure - I'd like him to loose AGAIN! Can't you let go of the fact that Gore LOST in 2000. All recounts showed that Jorge Bush won FL. Besides, the Dems didn't want the military votes counted and those typically are Republican votes!
We urgently need Al Gore to shut up and fix the lies in his propaganda movie!
2007-10-12 05:16:46 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 3⤋
YES!!! An Al Gore/ Barack Obama ticket would be the best thing that could happen to this country/
2007-10-12 14:49:38 · answer #6 · answered by Taylor M 2 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Are you old enough to know anything about Al Gore other than how he portrayed himself in his stupid boring movie?
He was a senator before he was VP. He wasn't particulary good at either job. Even his home state didn't vote for him when he ran for the oval office.
If you believe that he is good for the world and us, you have been getting your information from him. Do some fact checking and see just how good he is for the world and environment.
I will give you the fact that he created an awareness of climate issues, but in the meantime he personally polutes and uses more fossil fuels than my entire subdivision. His home consumes more than 10 times the electricity per square foot as my home, and he drives a truck that gets 1/2 of the milage as mine.
2007-10-12 04:50:57 · answer #7 · answered by DH1 4 · 2⤊ 3⤋
Al Gore is rational and intelligent. I think he's the best choice among all of the possible candidates out there.
People who think he is a raving lunatic are indoctrinated neocon sycophants. Maybe turn off Rush Limbaugh for a minute and actually listen to what Al Gore has to say.
2007-10-12 04:44:16 · answer #8 · answered by Tony P 2 · 3⤊ 3⤋
i might vote for him in a heartbeat. he seems to be the only individual who cares approximately international warming and is prepared to place it on the leading edge of the rustic's time table. he can not run returned, nevertheless. he gained the final time, and can not pass with the aid of all that returned. plus, he's doing plenty paintings for some thing that unquestionably concerns, he shouldn't difficulty with the bull$hit that comes with being president. i think of he's extra influencial and effective to the international in his modern skill.
2016-10-06 13:38:44 · answer #9 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think Al Gore should just continue with whether.
2007-10-14 17:37:16 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋