I didn't, but I stand corrected.
2007-10-12 04:32:45 · 18 answers · asked by Lavrenti Beria 6 in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
[or clean house or something]
That's what I hired you for at $2.50/hr, BTW, you're late.
2007-10-12 04:40:45 · update #1
[Anybody who idolises Beria...]
Try reading my profile and you'll see why I chose this avatar.
2007-10-12 04:41:51 · update #2
[Arafat did more for the cause of peace in the Middle East than anyone else I can think of.]
Have you registered with INS as an Alien yet or did they tell you to register with Area 51 for that type of Alien?
2007-10-12 04:45:44 · update #3
[This is the Peace Prize --- it goes to the people who are most responsible for rying to bring peace to the world over the past year. Arafat did this in his own way]
Yeah, just like Hitler did with his death camps.
2007-10-12 04:47:24 · update #4
I agree - it lost what credibility it had with me when that terrorist and murderer won. I would think it might even be an insult to win at this point.
2007-10-12 04:36:37 · answer #1 · answered by fanofchan 6 · 4⤊ 3⤋
As far as I'm concerned, the Nobel Foundation are similar in many respects to the people responsible for the Academy Awards - and have just as much credibility. Which is to say, none. They're arrogant Eurotrash liberals giving each other a reach around. What has Gore done to promote the cause of peace? Nothing.
His film is junk - it took people long enough to realize it - and so is that theory he's pushing of the Earth burning to a cinder. If he didn't rely on studies with major flaws and hyped-up bar graphs maybe he'd have half a brain. But no.
Who cares about truth anyway? Not him.
2007-10-12 06:13:33 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
This is the Peace Prize --- it goes to the people who are most responsible for rying to bring peace to the world over the past year. Arafat did this in his own way, he wanted peace as much as everyone else if not morek and tried to get it for ALL.. There was nothing wrong with his winning the prize. Just as this year, who better to give tjje [roze tp than the two people/groups that saw no need for war.. and sees the distruction of our of our planet by the environment.
2007-10-12 04:41:45 · answer #3 · answered by lochmessy 6 · 1⤊ 3⤋
The Nobel Peace Prize has become a sad pathetic joke.
Now we have the sad pathetic inventor of the internet winning for a film that Great Britain courts have found to be factually wrong in so many ways. Al Gore doesn't believe his own bs or he wouldn't be flying around in private jet, he wouldn't have a caravan of SUVs everywhere he goes, and his mansion wouldn't use 20 times the amount of energy as an average house.
Anyone reading this that has fallen hook, line, and sinker for this man-caused global warming THEORY, there is an easy $120,000 to be made at junkscience.com.
2007-10-12 04:42:54 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 3⤋
I don't know about Arafat, though he was a terrorist but Al Gore getting one? That is one of the biggest jokes in history. Yeah he is the latest crusader against global warming but he has a company that stands to make billions off of his ranting and ravings. Can you really trust the information he vomits as truth when he stands to profit from not telling the whole truth? The Nobel is a worthless award that has been subjugated to extoll the values of the liberals (worldwide).
2007-10-12 04:38:58 · answer #5 · answered by kba1a 3 · 5⤊ 2⤋
The peace prize like many other things has become a political chess piece. Al Gore winning the prize at this time will spotlight him into running for the presidency and the Dems will use this peace prize as part of his foundation. It's all politics and business. It's just a big game.
2007-10-12 04:37:31 · answer #6 · answered by rudolph_barton 2 · 6⤊ 3⤋
Arafat did more for the cause of peace in the Middle East than anyone else I can think of. He upheld the cause of Palestinian Nationhood while managing to move Palestinian attitudes beyond naqba and beyond rejectionism.
It is a shame that he was so maligned by the Zionist fascists and the US empire. One day, justice will be done.
By the way, the Nobel does not mean a thing.. can you imagine a genocidal maniac of the caliber of Henry Kissinger was given one? What a joke! the man precided over the worst bombing campaing in history... over the peasants of Indochina!!!! What a base immoral subhuman!!!
Learn your history, cat, you ought to stop supporting the fascists before the democrats of the world teach the US dictatorship and the European colony in Israel a lesson.
2007-10-12 04:40:07 · answer #7 · answered by Washington Irving 3 · 2⤊ 5⤋
Arafat, Jimmy Carter, United Nations....and now Al Gore.
Who's next? Alfred E. Neuman?
2007-10-12 04:37:16 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 7⤊ 3⤋
I don't think that the Peace Prize will ever have true meaning until we can achieve more peace. (its a good idea whose time has come, well we can only hope...)
2007-10-12 04:35:35 · answer #9 · answered by megalomaniac 7 · 4⤊ 2⤋
I hear you, it has cheapened the prize for Gore to have gotten it. I believe the national main stream media has manipulated another farce.
2007-10-12 04:39:07 · answer #10 · answered by ? 7 · 4⤊ 2⤋