Will LIBS still vote for her?
2007-10-12 04:16:02 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Good one! I don't think we have to worry about that. No way she is going to get elected.
2007-10-12 04:20:42 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 2⤋
They are already taxable as is most income, but usually those on welfare owe no taxes because they get so little.
Where do people come up with these unfounded rumours????
A lot of liberals do it too, so I'm not favoring one side, I'll leave that to FOX
2007-10-12 11:26:06 · answer #2 · answered by rumbler_12 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No she did not. Because they are already taxable. Hillary is not past the primary yet. She may not even win the Democratic primary.
2007-10-12 11:20:23 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
How ironic, she will be using tax dollars to pay for the welfare and be taxing those very same tax dollars. It seems the only ideas Hillary has include raising taxes or finding something new to tax. But that is par for the course, liberals just know how to tax and spend.
2007-10-12 11:22:05 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
Bush has already made them taxable, along with the salaries of our troops.
2007-10-12 11:35:45 · answer #5 · answered by Darth Vader 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes, but she'll have a problem with the large number of welfare recipients known as Congress.
2007-10-12 11:25:34 · answer #6 · answered by fangtaiyang 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
If ture, you can be sure she'll be taxing the rich to pay for it, and when there's not enough money from the rich, the tax burden will trickle down to the middle class. How's that for Hillary''s brand of "trickle down" economics?
2007-10-12 11:25:04 · answer #7 · answered by Truth B. Told ITS THE ECONOMY STUPID 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
welfare checks should be taxable. I work every day and i pay taxes, so why shouldn't people on welfare pay taxes?
2007-10-12 11:26:02 · answer #8 · answered by azure skye 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋
What's the point of that? Why not just cut benefits?
Ohh I get it, you need to create more government jobs to investigate taxes for millions of new people. Great way to stay efficient - the "savings" will be gobbled up by new bureaucracy.
2007-10-12 11:21:19 · answer #9 · answered by freedom first 5 · 2⤊ 2⤋
LOL, what next!! I like the way the dems are showing their true agenda sooo early!!
2007-10-12 11:21:47 · answer #10 · answered by Dr.NO 3 · 2⤊ 2⤋