Folks, assume a group of people perhaps Conservatives are in this beech front mansion enjoying a party. and they having a good time making fun of the global warming and Al Gore.
Un aware that a tsunami wave is approaching at speed of a 747 jumbo jet or say 500 miles/hour, in the middle of the ocean you could hardly feel it passing under neath you, but when it get to shallows of the sure it rises up to abut 500 feet high right in front of our party people: what do you thing is the first thing they are going to say:
1) oh crap?
2) the son of the gun was right?
3) I want my mummy?
4) help me?
5) i am tough i 'll survive this by holding my breath?
Which one?
2007-10-12 04:02:34 · 28 answers · asked by ? 5 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
I welcome and respect all your answers..
Libs, Dem or any, we are all one!
2007-10-12 04:13:21 · update #1
see how much fun we can have? i am lmao reading your comments i mean the funny ones. you guys are great.
politics could be boring do you agree?
2007-10-12 04:22:33 · update #2
Folks i forgot to tell you i am independent, although i don't like that term bcoz i do get ideas from parties, and i mix them with mine to come up with some thing better.
2007-10-12 04:36:27 · update #3
Folks take it easy i mean no harm?
2007-10-12 04:40:08 · update #4
OK i tell you what let change the scenario,
King of Saudi is having a family party in his beech palace on the Red Sea?!
is that better?.
2007-10-12 04:51:59 · update #5
sorry for spelling error
beech =wrong
beach= correct
I was a beach bum in San Diego, and i still can't spell beech,
oh sorry beach.
2007-10-12 08:15:51 · update #6
First, let's call them neocons instead of conservatives, please. I like conservatives.
Most I will go with #1, a few I will put down # 5 (why not), but
really,
I will say 6) "Well at least it'll drown some tree-hugging wussies too." or something similar.
I honestly think there is some slight deathwish in many of the neocons that has very little to do with any of the environmental things, that the politicians cater to (cater to the deathwish). Whether the politicians realise it much or not.
So the feeling would tend to include a bit of "Oh thank goodness it's all over now in a minute or so."
Like,
'Living with these liberals has been so terrible, even with our party in full power for six-ish years.'
as example:
Promise them some kind of whimpy-sized TAX!-!CUT, and most neocons will climb on board for dozens of smaller slightly-suicidal economic policies (suicidal for them, not wealthy politicians) faster than musical chairs, rushing to sit down and say "I support that stern, solid policy too". *Stern frown look on the face while saying it.*
add: How 'bout giving people a 7) though:
-it doesn't get my vote, but just for fun:
7) "Relax dear, at least it isn't the terrorists."
2007-10-12 04:29:34 · answer #1 · answered by roostershine 4 · 2⤊ 1⤋
2
2007-10-12 11:06:31 · answer #2 · answered by Knowitall 2 · 0⤊ 5⤋
Here is another scenario (I'll use good spelling in mine. "Beech? Really?) Let's say a group of liberals continue to spend millions of dollars for global warming research, and in twenty years, when the Earth starts to cool again because of it's cyclical nature, and absolutely nothing catastrophic happens... what do you think the first thing they will say?
1) Wow, we sure wasted a lot of taxpayer money on nothing.
2) Let's watch the Al Gore movie again, we need a good laugh.
3) Gee, maybe the smarter people really were right.
or my personal guess...
4) Oh no! Now we are going through another ice age, send money!
2007-10-12 11:12:26 · answer #3 · answered by Scott B 7 · 5⤊ 2⤋
Could be they heard the warning sirens and got the hell out of there.
Now perhaps you could use the edit option and explain what has global warming to do with tsunamis.
You see that another reason we don't buy this crap.
Y'all just make it up as you go.
2007-10-12 11:16:31 · answer #4 · answered by CFB 5 · 2⤊ 1⤋
How does the lunacy of Al Gore compare with a natural disaster? (global warming does not cause tsunami's)
the Republican response would be to pray, then try to find a way to survive the natural disaster then start rebuilding if they survives whereas the liberal response would be to declare Al Gore king of the world, then blame Bush for the tsunami and then sit and wait for the government to send help and complain about it when it got there
2007-10-12 11:11:43 · answer #5 · answered by 1 free American 5 · 4⤊ 3⤋
Most of the BEECH front property in this country is owned by Liberals so that would have to be one bad arsed tsunami to REECH Oklahoma City.
2007-10-12 11:09:44 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 2⤋
I agree with the gentelamn "Roosters" requesting replacement of NEOCONS instead of conservatives... they are the ills of our modern time they have highjaked civilit and morality for the mpney grabbers zionist ultr right treators.
I go for "Crap!"
Thats what they are.
2007-10-12 20:52:28 · answer #7 · answered by LEE DA 4 · 2⤊ 1⤋
First, learn to spell, secondly we would say that they need better emergency alert systems funding instead of research on cyclical science fiction.
2007-10-12 11:16:13 · answer #8 · answered by Greg 7 · 2⤊ 1⤋
6) Surfs up!
Definitely not:
7) Where's FEMA?
2007-10-12 11:09:09 · answer #9 · answered by floatingbloatedcorpse 4 · 6⤊ 0⤋
6) Al Gore doesn't like white people
2007-10-12 12:19:46 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋