http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20071012/wl_afp/russiausmilitarydiplomacy_071012142744;_ylt=AjFJqhK.7Brnz.h4WNPIztZbbBAF
2007-10-12 03:49:01 · 18 answers · asked by Page 4 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Do they hate DIPLOMACY THAT MUCH?
Just curious....
2007-10-12 03:49:47 · update #1
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20071012/ap_on_re_eu/us_russia
2007-10-12 03:50:16 · update #2
Picking fights with and invading sovereign nations is part of the neoconservative platform. Without it, they would simply have no means of accomplishing their end goal of American hubris across the globe nor could they justify spending unlimited amounts of taxpayer money for "defense" purposes.
No, a neo-con is no longer a "liberal mugged by reality." Today's prominent neoconservatives were NEVER liberal.
2007-10-12 03:52:08 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 10⤊ 6⤋
it extremely is the old divide and triumph over habitual,works each time.nicely, different than whilst utilized by utilising George Bush.With him it extremely is triumph over divide,decimate,injury and set adrift in melancholy. the international and its mom knew what a barbaric chief Saddam replaced into,certainly he replaced into overtly supported and courted by utilising the U.S. regardless of this. It incredibly much beggars theory that it would desire to be mentioned that the Iraqi human beings might have been greater valuable off if the individuals had left him in place.actually hundreds might nevertheless have been alive,hundreds greater does no longer be displaced and the liberty Iraqis have been promised has been replaced by utilising an excellent harsher regime.Iran will now be like Afghanistan.yet having mentioned that possibly that replaced into Bush's plan.
2016-11-08 02:39:44 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Because of the chicken hawks we have in this administration!Just look at the ones in charge, bush went AWOL in the champagne division in Alabama cuz he wouldn't take a urine sample(guess why?!) His daddy got him into the guard to save him from going to Vietnam! Dick(VP) got 5 deferments and avoided Vietnam! He was such a loser in his youth, he flunked outta Yale, got two DUI's and dropped out of another couple of colleges before he finally stayed and earned a degree years later! Later on, the warmonger said that he had other priorities besides going to war!!! Richard pearl, paul wolfowitz, ashcroft, fat limpballs(limbaugh)also known as bush's water carrier, and danny hastert, tom delay- gosh, too many to list but as much as they hated going to fight for our country, they now condone any war that seems profitable!!! They love wars as long as others go fight them! That's the neocon way! Chicken hawks, all of them!
2007-10-12 04:52:51 · answer #3 · answered by liberalthinktank 3 · 2⤊ 0⤋
People have no idea how awful war is. They justify it through convoluted philosophies but don't realize at the end of the day someone is dying. I'm not anti-soldier I'm anti usage of soldiers in order to progress the profit margins of closely aligned corporations like Blackwater and Haliburton. It amazes me to no end why people forget lessons like Lyndon Johnson's wife owning a construction company in Viet Nam. But at the end of the day if you scare people enough, they'll let you strip you of their civil liberties and are happy to live in a police state. Land of the free? Only if you agree.
To the Marine above. I respect what you're doing, but I've also met a lot of veterans who disagreed. Does that make their time spent any less than yours? I had a friend who had a tour in Iraq and was in a fire fight and verbatim when I asked him what the thought about it, "It was a bunch of bullsh*t." I know a guy who played for the Oilers and the Chiefs and he was in Viet Nam when he was 17. I quote, "The worse thing I did was not throw my weapon down and say I'm not fighting anymore." One of my really good friends is in Iraq right now on his 3rd tour. I asked him what he thought: "The reason why we're there is bullsh*t. I need to go back to watch out for my buddies."
2007-10-12 03:55:06 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 2⤋
I wish there was respect for other Nations, cultures, way of life and thinking...then there would be World Peace.
2007-10-12 04:13:17 · answer #5 · answered by belle 4 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Neoconservatives are Imperialists.They believe the US at this point in History should use its military superiority to dominate the world politically and economically
2007-10-12 03:55:36 · answer #6 · answered by justgoodfolk 7 · 7⤊ 2⤋
How is that question relevant to the news article you posted? There is no threat of war from Russia. Putin is just staging a military showdown with bomber planes that are strategically out of date by 25 years so that the world won't find out how small his penis is.
2007-10-12 03:53:45 · answer #7 · answered by thalog482 4 · 3⤊ 3⤋
Would you have us be like Prime minister Chamberlain before World War 2. Look what his diplomacy got.
2007-10-12 03:55:05 · answer #8 · answered by kevin s 6 · 1⤊ 3⤋
Those sovereign nations that are supporting the type of people came here on 9/11 and attack us.
Iraq where the explosive expert from the 1st WTC attack fled to for safety.
We are in talks and making progress with Korea.
2007-10-12 04:01:25 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 6⤋
The American People have spoken and we will get the troops out of Iraq. Well, this has not happened so we must assume the Liberals to be Warmongers since they are not doing the will of the people that they promised. Or they are liars.
2007-10-12 03:52:36 · answer #10 · answered by ken 6 · 4⤊ 6⤋