What is joint custody? Is it really in the best interest for the kids?

Question

My daughter is filing for divorce and her soon-to-be ex wants to have joint custody. I have had many people that have experienced joint custody say that it is a pain in the butt and delays care for the child because both parents have to have a say. Sometimes the parents do not agree but the care has to wait until they do.?!?

Answer 1

Joint has a primary parent.#

Answer 2

Unless there is abuse or neglect by one of the parents, it is better to have joint custody so that the children have both parents in their lives. It can be a pain but it can also go somewhat smoothly if done without letting any animosity affect the children. Usually, the custodial parent can be the one to provide the medical care for a child on a day to day basis but if there is need for any major medical care, it probably should be discussed by both parents in order to decide what to do. It sounds like the person who told you that had those problems and is relating that to you but that doesn't have to always be the case.

Answer 3

Most states prefer JOINT CUSTODY...which really means nothing. The courts want children to have equal access to both parents because this has been determined to be in their best interests. Things can change that though, parents who interfere with the other parents visitation or custody can end up with nothing so it is important to allow visitation and not do any mudslinging or make false statements of abuse to anyone. Usually one parent is awarded physical custody. The one that has physical custody usually is the parent who makes the decisions as to medical, education, etc.

Answer 4

I have joint custody with my ex and it works out great for us. It really depends on the parents and the situation. Yeah sometimes we have our disagreements, but we both want what's best for our kids and find a way to work it out. And as far as care for the child, if they need immediate care I don't see why they would have to wait for the other parent to proceed. One parent should be able to make health care decisions in an emergency situation. I've never been told both parents had to be present and in agreement.

Answer 5

Joint custody means you both retain parental right over the child(ren). I think it is better because then it gives the child options. If you truely care about your child, you will be willing to put up with the extra strain of needing both parents approval on certain things (which usually doesn't happen anyway) to provide your child comfort in knowing that they can go to either parent anytime they need something.

Answer 6

My sympathies to you and the toddlers. There are 2 factors to pick: how accepted jobs and decision making for the toddlers will artwork after the divorce, and how plenty time the toddlers will spend with each and every be sure. There are no elementary solutions. in case you the two get alongside and normally agree in how the toddlers are being raised, there might desire to be little undertaking in sharing the parental accepted jobs. in case you have had problems all alongside on agreeing on even elementary issues like church attendance, activities participation, and the place to attend colleges, it would in all probability be greater valuable to vest one be sure with that duty. in case you combat for sole custody out of vindictiveness or given which you want that skill to your self, it particularly is your decision, yet don't be taken aback if ten years down the line the different be sure isn't very supportive once you have problems rasing your teen. I communicate from journey in this one (i'm the non-custodial of course). As for the way the time the toddlers spend with the guy mum and dad is desperate, I even have considered an entire slew of diverse methods it particularly is carried out. If the mummy and dad stay close to one yet another, comparable time distribution can artwork incredibly plenty and seems to me to be the fairest for the toddlers. yet actuality intrudes sometime and now and lower back it particularly is right for the toddlers to stay on the whole with one be sure. there is not any right answer. you may desire to continually evaluate the toddlers whilst making this decision. what would be suited for the toddlers, because of the fact the chop up would be hard on them and (many times) they love the two mum and dad and should no longer be made to pick factors. it particularly is the suited advice i can furnish, and that i choose you each and every of the suited and want that the impacts of the replace are actually the least achieveable on all worried.

Answer 7

joint custody is I think better for the children/child... but with the medical care of that child I would have it be the mothers decision and put into court papers but being able to spend time with both parents is better I think

Answer 8

Both parents unless shown to be unfit are entitled to joint custody of THEIR children. Your grandchildren did not come into this world solely through their mother...she HAD to have help to get pregnant. As long as their father is a fit parent he has every right to spend as much time with them as their mother does and the children are entitled to exposure to BOTH parents because they are the children of BOTH parents, not just the mother. Yes it can be incovienent for the parents...but that's not what is important, keeping the children's lives as "normal" and as happy as possible is what is important.

Answer 9

I think its in the best intrest of the child most of the time to have joint custody. They both have a right to make decions regarding their child. I think if they have the best intrests of the child at heart they can both agree on the right ones to make.

Answer 10

Divorced or not those kids still have two parents and both should have a say in their care. The ones who say it is a pain in the butt have been dealing with an idiot or they ARE the idiot. Two mature adults can handle it.