Yea, and it'll get worse during and following Limbaugh's broadcast.
2007-10-12 02:49:45
·
answer #1
·
answered by alphabetsoup2 5
·
1⤊
2⤋
Well I don't see how pointing out Earth's natural cycle is "peaceful". The award's name should be changed.
Bush should get a prize for inventing the Google though! lol! (long time no "see", how ya been?)
2007-10-12 09:56:00
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I think some neocons actually thought they would give it to Rush Limbaugh. Talk about living in a fantasy world.
2007-10-12 10:06:42
·
answer #3
·
answered by Dinah Steeler 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
I personally think that Al Gore should win it because he really cares for our Earth and all George Bush cares about is sending people to fight for something we don't even know about anymore and people are getting killed because of it.
2007-10-12 09:52:08
·
answer #4
·
answered by kilopapa45 3
·
0⤊
1⤋
No, but someone who actually EARNED it would be nice.
Let's see, a woman who saved many children in the halocaust. Monks who were fighting for peace in Myanmar or Al Gore.
Hmmm...
2007-10-12 09:50:58
·
answer #5
·
answered by time_wounds_all_heelz 5
·
1⤊
1⤋
Yes, they think bush should get it for trying to Christianize Iraq.
2007-10-12 09:55:51
·
answer #6
·
answered by Holy Cow! 7
·
0⤊
1⤋
YA seems to be packed full of un-american republicans, people who despise their fellow Americans. If they won't cheer when an American wins an international award, when will they? It's very disgusting and twisted.
2007-10-12 09:59:02
·
answer #7
·
answered by Zardoz 7
·
1⤊
2⤋
How about someone who was truthful...and be honest w/ yourself what type of peace did his FICTIONAL movie bring about?
2007-10-12 09:57:24
·
answer #8
·
answered by tll 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
Most Def (LOL)!
2007-10-12 09:59:49
·
answer #9
·
answered by Jackie Oh! 7
·
0⤊
0⤋