Lol of course- you know W causes all these disasters including the tsunami. = )
Interestingly the levy that broke was repaired in the late 90s and the contractor told the Corp of Engineers that the base wasnt good enough but they said to leave it.
2007-10-12 02:30:51
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
0⤋
Isn't burning fossil fuel sort of an anti-weather machine since it disrupts the natural weather process?
You're wrong about where we are in the cycle. The 70's was supposed to be the beginning of the next cooling leg, but global warming interrupted it and we warmed instead. Also, there was a solar minimum last year which corresponded to one of the hottest years recorded. This contradicts the solar warming camp.
As you can see from the chart below, our poor earth tried to start cooling again as part of its natural cycle, but something (namely the industrial revolution) interrupted it and continues to do so. This phenomenon has never happened before as you can see from the shapes of the high temp peaks in the past and today.
2007-10-12 02:29:44
·
answer #2
·
answered by ideogenetic 7
·
2⤊
4⤋
Whoaaa... i'm no fan of George W., yet i think of you're giving him a sprint too plenty credit. Plotting to dedicate a hate crime against African individuals in Louisiana by utilising potential of a hurricane? it particularly is a sprint some distance-fetched. to no longer point out pointless on condition that an impressive variety of things that have been given destroyed by utilising Katrina had already been hit incredibly no longer elementary economically. Plus no longer all and sundry laid low with utilising Katrina replaced into black. the dislike crime got here in whilst he did no longer carry a finger to assist the survivors. additionally, international warming all started way before Bush took place of work. He merely did actually no longer something to assist supply up it, and it took him waaay too long to even admit it existed--i'm confident partly because of the fact he replaced into thinking approximately earnings quite of, you comprehend, having a planet in some years. i'm with you that he might desire to have exceeded some legislations approximately gas intake and determination fuels, yet shall we spend all day speaking approximately what he coulda/shoulda finished jointly as in place of work. And for those of you who think of chilly snaps are evidence that there is not any international warming, climate replace has little or no to do with daily climate varieties. international warming is on a much broader scale and if the undertaking isn't halted in its tracks, we are all going to start to work out plenty greater erratic climate as time is going on. it's going to be evidence sufficient that jointly as the polar ice caps are nevertheless chilly, the glaciers are melting each and every of a similar.
2016-11-08 02:32:52
·
answer #3
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Is that the same machine he used to create 9/11?
Oh wait, that happened because the world hates us due to his policies.
2007-10-12 02:31:35
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
1⤋
Looks like the con hive mind is reaching critical mass.
Run for cover people!
2007-10-12 02:35:09
·
answer #5
·
answered by ck4829 7
·
2⤊
0⤋
Himand Al Gore were in cahoots to get Al the Nobel
2007-10-12 02:29:50
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
3⤋
Yea, the loons claim he turned on the HAARP machine and broke the levees
2007-10-12 02:29:45
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
4⤋
Of course he did. What else is he good for?
2007-10-12 02:29:33
·
answer #8
·
answered by HERE WE GO BROWNIES, BEAT PIT!! 3
·
1⤊
1⤋