Do you agree with the Nobel Prize committee?

Question

My big problem with the award is they gave it to a heavy polluter, one who has a highly polluting jet and the most energy inefficient home in Tennessee. Don't you think it would be more effective to give it to a person who walked the walk, and not told everyone else to do the right thing?

Answer 1

my problem with the award is that they gave it to a phony, a fraud, a man pushing a leftist agenda and this 'prize' is part of that agenda. the world organization of leftist elites has a plan for world domination and al gore is the frontman. THAT is why he won an oscar and THAT is why he won the nobel prize. how else can you explain the fact the gore refused to debate this issue with opponents every time he was challenged and why don't the experts on climate change that refute gore's claims ever get a public forum to debate him? this is a sham of a travesty of a sham and we should not be sitting on our heels and letting this happen.

and yes, i agree with you that gore is the poster child for conspicuous consumption, a gigantic carbon footprint hypocrite and general all around phoney baloney elitist snob.

Answer 2

Well dude, compared with some other prizes, the Prize nomination and selection process is long and rigorous. This is a key reason why the Prizes have grown in importance over the years to become the most important prizes in their field (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nobel_Prize#Nomination_and_selection). The Nobel Prize consists of 6 categories though:-

* Nobel Peace Prize 2007 - Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) and Albert Arnold (Al) Gore Jr. for their efforts to build up and disseminate greater knowledge about man-made climate change, and to lay the foundations for the measures that are needed to counteract such change.

* The Nobel Prize in Physics 2007 - Albert Fert and Peter Grünberg for the discovery of Giant Magnetoresistance.

* The Nobel Prize in Chemistry 2007 - Gerhard Ertl for his studies of chemical processes on solid surfaces.

* The Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine 2007 - Mario R. Capecchi, Sir Martin J. Evans and Oliver Smithies for their discoveries of principles for introducing specific gene modifications in mice by the use of embryonic stem cells.

* The Nobel Prize in Literature 2007 - Doris Lessing that epicist of the female experience, who with scepticism, fire and visionary power has subjected a divided civilisation to scrutiny.

* The Sveriges Riksbank Prize in Economic Sciences in Memory of Alfred Nobel 2006 - Edmund S. Phelps for his analysis of intertemporal tradeoffs in macroeconomic policy.

Cheers and have a nice week ahead :)

Answer 3

Your point is well taken. At the same time, bringing about the awareness of global warming must have some negatives consequences.

Gore could never have been as effective without his actions. I view it similar to placing a drop of oil in an oil spill so that crews can be set-up to clean it all up.

Does that make sense to you? (just curious)

Answer 4

honestly giving the Nobel prize to Al Gore wasn't too smart. For already inconsistancies have been found in his global warming documentry; and already a group in New Zealands wants his documentry oscar yanked from him.

Answer 5

Well he beat a woman who all she did was save kids from the holocaust but then Al Gore is warning us about something that may or may not be true. The fantasy of 20 foot waves appears to be more important then saving kids from extinction

Answer 6

The Nobel Prize committee just made themselves irrelevant.