Global warming-alarmists are definitely rewarded handsomely....
2007-10-12 02:02:36 · 26 answers · asked by Frank Dileo 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
I just dont understand their voting process....maybe they just felt bad for him for losing the election...I dunno....he cries "wolf" and gets a peace prize?
2007-10-12 02:14:31 · answer #1 · answered by tll 6 · 4⤊ 2⤋
In the immortal words of the Bard, "it is a tale told by an idiot, full of sound and fury, signifying nothing."
Equally applicable to political documentaries, the Nobel Prize, and life in general. Gotta love Shakespeare -- he always hit the nail on the head.
To answer your question, I couldn't care less what he won, or who else that thing could have been awarded to. In the end, none of this matters. Neither history nor fate will be directed by a committee -- and people will be immortalized or forgotten without regard to what prizes they did or did not win. It's all meaningless. A couple of thousand years from now, no one will know these Nobel Prize winners by name, and school children will laugh at our stupid antics as mere curiosities, to make dry history books entertaining.
2007-10-12 02:27:27 · answer #2 · answered by Rеdisca 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
11 "blatant errors". I guess thats why it wasn't a Nobel in Science. I guess you need facts for that. I wasn't aware that the Nobel committee was giving out film awards, I think they managed to cheapen a once prestigious award.
BTW-I'm not even a Bush supporter, but, Gore lost, give it up. Hell, most of you whining sacks never even voted. Just sick of your frigging whining. Move on, get a life or something.
2007-10-12 02:31:54 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
Hmm....i ask your self what replaced his techniques? [ whilst in many circumstances considered a climate skeptic, John R. Christy became a co-drafter of the yank Geophysical Union's December 2003 place fact on climate exchange, which concludes that: "Human activities are an increasing form of fixing Earth's climate, and that organic impacts on my own can't clarify the rapid strengthen in floor temperatures suggested in the process the 2nd a million/2 of the twentieth century." ] those fossil gasoline babies, i assume.
2016-10-22 03:26:04 · answer #4 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I'm happy now that EVEN George Bush has taken notice of Global warming - perhaps he is just another "alarmists".
2007-10-12 02:17:53 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
Actually he shared the prize. And also, what does global warming have to do with world peace? He couldn't win a legitimate Nobel Prize for Science or something?
2007-10-12 02:07:43 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 4⤋
Yes indeed. I sure am. And I wouldn't call him an alarmist until he has this nation perpetually at Level Orange.
2007-10-12 02:15:59 · answer #7 · answered by KERMIT M 6 · 3⤊ 1⤋
sure why not, to celebrate I shall drive to the woods after work today, in my V8 SUV. cut down a nice big tree for fire wood. While I am at it, to kill two birds with one stone, I will also burn my trash from last week. light my cigarette, have a beer, and continue to wounder if the absents of people with conservative ideology considerations are just coincidental.
2007-10-12 02:13:08 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋
No, why should I be happy for a person who creates a movie not based on facts that is acclaimed as fact and held up as a warning/example to us and who wins a prize for all his "work" done to help the enviroment (which actually doesn't). Hmmmmmm.....nope, still not happy; fiction protrayed as fact is dishonest at the very least.
2007-10-12 02:11:29 · answer #9 · answered by Kinic 2 · 6⤊ 3⤋
I was happy when I heard a UK judge ruled that if public schools show Al Gore's movie, they also have to explain the 11 blatant falsehoods that are in it. I think American schools should be that responsible, instead of showing it to kids as if the information is indisputable fact.
2007-10-12 02:08:04 · answer #10 · answered by smellyfoot ™ 7 · 5⤊ 4⤋