2007-10-12 02:00:58 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Maybe, but they'd be even happier if he'd won an award for a film about how to inject your religion into government and destroy America at the same time. However, George Bush doesn't allow documentaries to be filmed at the White House. Like most cons, he doesn't like the truth to get out.
2007-10-12 02:04:36 · answer #1 · answered by Holy Cow! 7 · 6⤊ 3⤋
Yes , They should be given an award on how to look down on the poor, and how to steal from the working poor by making them pay taxes and the rich don't have to. How deny poor children health care, and justify it and not give a rat's @$$ about the soring unemployment by siting there is work, never mind that it is flipping hamburgers or busting tables in self serve buffets, for Min. wage part time without any hearth care wahatsoever.
2007-10-12 10:02:35 · answer #2 · answered by pkvan 4 · 3⤊ 0⤋
I don't know, but now we have the confirmation that the Nobel Prize is also a political tool, and not really an award that matter...
This thing is going too far!!! It just look like a big joke to me!!
2007-10-12 13:45:56 · answer #3 · answered by Jedi squirrels 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
No, they would still be working on cranking out smears of the Nobel Peace Prize itself.
As long as they have such a poor showing, and they keep being awarded to Democrat politicians, they will claim it is worthless.
Such transparent envy.
Expect them to be calling it a communist award soon, if not already.
2007-10-12 09:06:56 · answer #4 · answered by oohhbother 7 · 3⤊ 2⤋
Of course, with bonus footage of how to deny children health-care and start wars of choice for the military-industrial complex by faking the evidence.
2007-10-12 09:19:36 · answer #5 · answered by ideogenetic 7 · 3⤊ 0⤋
Of coursethey would. No one has a right to keep money. Just like those retards the Browns who quit paying taxes. I'm glad they got arrested, it would be funnier if they were shot.
2007-10-12 09:19:18 · answer #6 · answered by Dk2432 2 · 2⤊ 2⤋
We'd be happier if he had a little integrity left in him. Al Gore is a con artist who should be downright ashamed of the hysteria he is druming up with his lies and misrepresentations.
Pollution is bad, we can all agree on that but not for the insane reasons that Gore promotes which he KNOWS are not true but it isnt about the environment for him it is about power, money and a one world government.
2007-10-12 09:08:34 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 5⤋
Will any of us ever be able to quit name calling and work together to solve these problems?
2007-10-12 09:08:39 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
Nice shot!
2007-10-12 09:21:25 · answer #9 · answered by grumpyoldman 7 · 3⤊ 1⤋
No, I would be happier if he hadn’t profited so much by scaring the heck out of people and distracting them from the real threat of terrorism.
MANBEARPIG!
2007-10-12 09:04:56 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 6⤋