English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Sharing a Peace Prize with the Terrorist Yassar Arafat?

Don't forget Gore also shares an Academy Award with the likes of Matt Damon!

(Meanwhile back at the White House)

2007-10-12 01:56:53 · 19 answers · asked by PNAC ~ Penelope 4 in Politics & Government Politics

19 answers

Well, I don't think Gore had the Peace Prize handed to him by the Supreme Court. Nor do I think any votes for his prize weren't counted. Just a hunch.

2007-10-12 02:02:02 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 4 1

If you are speaking of Bush as the two term president, and I think you are. Are you kidding me? Bush stole both those elections. If Gore had gotten to the White House, he would have had both acheivements.
I find the Academy Award, Matt Damon thing amusing, since it is the Republican Party that really is swayed by Hollywood.
Reagan, Arnold, and now Fred. Give us all a break would you.

2007-10-12 09:16:41 · answer #2 · answered by Ohsassyone 3 · 1 0

Ok you can make fun of Al Gore and Yassar Arafat but when you make fun of the man that plays Jason Borne, you have gone to far.

2007-10-12 09:13:18 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

Being a two term President with a rock bottom approval rating is an 'acheivement' (sic)?
Especially after being the President with the highest approval rating in history after 9/11? Great achievement?

Yeah. Sure.

2007-10-12 09:07:08 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 2 1

Here's some bigger achievements for you!
Adolf Hitler- Fuhrer from 1934-1945
Omar al-Bashir dictator, Sudan. In power since 1989.
Kim Jong-il, North Korea. In power since 1994
Than Shwe, Burma In power since 1992.
Robert Mugabe, Zimbabwe. In power since 1980

2007-10-12 09:07:40 · answer #5 · answered by Global warming ain't cool 6 · 2 0

Meanwhile, back at the White House, the Republican party is in shambles because of the absurdly flimsy administration of the current white house.

2007-10-12 09:04:10 · answer #6 · answered by alphabetsoup2 5 · 2 1

Yes, your assumptions are correct. The Nobel Prize is now
a joke......more people are winning it that are anything but
peaceful. So, I guess the answer to your question is "being
a two-term president" and still going strong after daily bashing
by the liberals and media, and then those stupid stake-outs
by those sign=carriers at his ranch in Texas by a woman who
now cares about her son getting killed in Iraq than she cared
about him growing up, as he chose to live with his Father.

2007-10-12 09:09:30 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 3

It depends on what kind of job the President did, and what the Nobel award was for.

2007-10-12 09:03:14 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 4 0

(Meanwhile, back at the White House,) the corruption continues unabated.Even tho he was elected by the supreme court, and earning the title "worst president ever"

2007-10-12 09:12:22 · answer #9 · answered by handyrandy 5 · 3 0

Depends on the President.

2007-10-12 09:00:48 · answer #10 · answered by grumpyoldman 7 · 7 0

fedest.com, questions and answers