Clinton just think you get two for the price of one hence first man bill.
2007-10-09 21:31:54
·
answer #1
·
answered by evander 3
·
0⤊
2⤋
Gore is not a winner. Choosing him will be wasting a good opportunity created by Bush .
It should be Clinton. As one of the friends here rightly mentions, you get the services of two( Hillary and Bill) by electing one( Hillary ).
2007-10-10 05:52:06
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
For president, none of the above. Why even mention Gore? He was a looser in 2000. Now he's just a hypocrite!
2007-10-10 10:02:26
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Obama,or Clinton would do so long as they have a principled lifestyle and wont be in office just to burden more of the americans and the whole world about weapons of mass destruction accusation and creating wars.
2007-10-10 04:04:45
·
answer #4
·
answered by nicklaus 1
·
1⤊
2⤋
I really would like to see Obama, but I think Clinton will get the Democractic nomination. I don't see how anyone could be worse than what we have now.
2007-10-10 06:17:48
·
answer #5
·
answered by zento1110 4
·
0⤊
2⤋
Scary scary thought, but I would rather a Clinton/Obama ticket than any of the Rep running. Guliani... puleeeze.. and Romney? OMG.. I live In Massachusetts and know what he did and did not do....... I am voting NONE OF THE ABOVE! Not one of the candidates is worthy of my vote.
2007-10-10 08:10:11
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
2⤋
i call obama. i really,really,really dont wanna see clinton (espcecially clinton) or gore in office
2007-10-10 03:57:01
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
2⤋
Juliani with Mike Huckabee as VP.
.
Edit. : AL Gore? ...That robot has been recalled.
2007-10-10 04:20:00
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
None of the Above.
Some random Republican guy will rise up and take all the votes :)
2007-10-10 03:57:22
·
answer #9
·
answered by robbyack2000 2
·
2⤊
1⤋
clinton all the way
2007-10-10 03:57:02
·
answer #10
·
answered by redkazoo 5
·
1⤊
2⤋