B) common sense. One can learn to read and garner knowledge from books, but common sense seems to a form of intelligence that cannot be taught
2007-10-09 18:25:25
·
answer #1
·
answered by philos34002 4
·
2⤊
1⤋
I'd say none. There always should be a balance.
After all, I wouldn't take "common sense" and "book knowledge" as 2 mutually exclusive concepts. I believe book knowledge is supposed to help us gain better understanding of common sense or that knowledge is nonsense.
2007-10-10 01:31:16
·
answer #2
·
answered by cruiser 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Well for some reason I am more attracted to those who have more book knowledge, but I respect people with more common sense. Perhaps it is because I am like that... no common sense AT ALL.
2007-10-10 01:26:16
·
answer #3
·
answered by akigeni 3
·
2⤊
0⤋
B. A person can not learn everything in life from a book. However! If they had true common sense, they would pick up the occassional book to expand and educate - i mean, that would be common sense!
2007-10-10 01:27:39
·
answer #4
·
answered by kelstar 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
A combination of both. People who have no common sense are boring, but so are people who have no book knowledge.
2007-10-10 01:25:31
·
answer #5
·
answered by The Nana of Nana's 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
As you said, (B) has common sense, not common intelligence. (A) has book knowledge, not book intelligence. Both are hardly "intelligent", perhaps smart, but not intelligent.
2007-10-10 01:27:49
·
answer #6
·
answered by evangelion 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
I'd respect A more as that person has gone to the effort to learn something. Not everyone can do that!
2007-10-10 01:25:52
·
answer #7
·
answered by greythound crazy 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
B The ancient greeks had a name for it-Metis. It's what made their heroes, heroes.
2007-10-10 08:48:16
·
answer #8
·
answered by Steve C 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
i pick A because i think common sense is over rated.
2007-10-10 01:25:52
·
answer #9
·
answered by alida 4
·
1⤊
2⤋
Gotta go with B
2007-10-10 01:25:19
·
answer #10
·
answered by Sage 6
·
0⤊
0⤋