Sorry Mr. Vijay.M -Lawyer, We have fought a similar case of violation of MRTP Act but the Shipra Autforities influenced and bought the law and judiciary and eventually we lost the case.In fact Judiciary is the most Corrupt segment in India as also corroborated by the ex chief CBI - Mr.Vittal.
So lawyer or no lawyer , we stand no chance of getting a fair deal in this country and we have to live with this till another alternative is found out for which we shall strive.
2007-10-09 16:25:48 · 4 answers · asked by Arun S 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Law & Ethics
Each case is different from other. The facts & circumstances of a case can be similar to other but it cannot be same as the other. The Court or the Commission decide the individual case on its own merits, what happened in a similar case can be only to guide them not decide accordingly. This issue of over charging for electricity provided to the resident of the building or colony has to be as per the rates prevalent & decided by the state government for the city/state. In case the builders/colonizers are charging higher rates then the applicable rates, they should have reasons to do so to justify their rate hike of the electricity bill which they get for lower rates from the state electricity department. The MRTP commission will have to be satisfied by them for this rate hike & the commission will decide whether such rate hike are reasonably justified of not. To say that this builder was able to influence the commission/court in a similar case previously is not right as their plea for any extra charges for any services to the residents any time must have been based on some relevant piece of evidence & on the basis of this the commission/court decided that matter in their favor. In the present case too if they are able to reasonably justify their increase in the electricity charges they will win otherwise they loose. I have been personally involved in cases with Ansals myself & won against them. As you know Ansals group in no smaller group & they can also have tried their best but since my facts/evidence & circumstances were more genuine when it came for hearing by the N.D. district consumer’s forum & Delhi state commission, the matter was decided in my favor. First you see what all goes in your favor & what all they have in favor of their claim of charging extra from you people & how you can counter that before the commission/court then only proceed. Why most of the resident welfare associations loose their cases in all such commissions/forums/courts etc because they themselves are flying high & depend on a local resident lawyer that they fail to find the real counter for the builders/colonizer’s claim who engage services of the best of the lawyers/advocates for this purpose.
2007-10-09 19:08:57 · answer #1 · answered by vijay m Indian Lawyer 7 · 5⤊ 0⤋
No. it is your responsiblity as a puppy proprietor to observe your animal. domestic canines could desire to in no way obtain "canines" toys considering they are domestic canines! you are able to desire to observe your animal whilst they pay with thier toys for this very reason. Sorry, however the fee is yours. A Lawsuit may well be frivulous and no lawyer might take that form of situations because of the fact the blame is yours because of the fact the owner.
2016-12-18 03:25:38 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I agree with my above answer.
2007-10-09 17:15:48 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Oh, I thought you meant with real rope. . . now I'm disappointed :(
2007-10-09 16:34:10 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋