What debate? Seemed more like a promotion for McCain, Romney, Guiliani and Thompson. for instance Ron Paul went a second over his 30 seconds, he was interrupted, but Guiliani was allowed to talk almost a minute past his 30 seconds.
It is obvious the 4 mentioned candidates are being promoted by the media, so I will not be voting for any of them since there is something fishy about them if the media supports these people.
2007-10-09 11:18:20 · 5 answers · asked by ST 4 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
smartass, you know I never seen an actual debate ever in all my years of watching these. They rarely answer questions, they don't actually debate each other, if anything they try to act like they all agree with each other
2007-10-09 11:22:16 · update #1
Giuliani did not mention 9-11 enough, I had my beer on hand to drink ever time he said 9-11, and I'm still sober. That's a first for a Republican debate, he is really letting me down
2007-10-09 11:23:43 · answer #1 · answered by Michael G 4 · 4⤊ 1⤋
Haven't seen the debate on the West Coast yet, so I can't comment on this one.
However, with 8 candidates it's hard to 'debate' in 1.5 hours. These 'debates' are more of a forum to express ideas and discuss issues.
But I agree that only the top 4 are getting any press time, which is absolute BS. My top 2 favorite candidates, Paul and Huckabee, can't get any time on the air.
2007-10-09 11:24:12 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋
Yes
2007-10-09 11:21:06 · answer #3 · answered by ASA 2 · 1⤊ 2⤋
All of the recent debates have been pretty damn ridiculous, Republican and Democratic.
Agreed
2007-10-09 11:20:28 · answer #4 · answered by smartass 3 · 5⤊ 1⤋
No it was a debate!~!
2007-10-09 11:21:08 · answer #5 · answered by Hunter 4 · 2⤊ 5⤋