We saw them expose a CIA officer named Valerie Plame
Exposing a CIA officer is an act of treason and it also exposed many others that were still under cover out in the field.
They exposed her to discredit her husband Joe Wilson who had went to Niger and verified Saddam did not purchase components for WMD's like the Whitehouse said was the reason for the Iraq war. "Mushroom Clouds"
Now they have exposed a company who did nothing but research terror groups and the websites they use. This took the last seven years to develop and was an enormous tool in tracking chatter and video posts by Islamic extremists. Because of this al_Qaida is now silent on the net with little or no way of knowing what they are up to. The whole program has gone black.
How are we supposed to fight a war on terror when the Whitehouse keeps going out of its way to damage information capabilities.
America is not safer since 9/11, other than the fact that they put troops as targets in the Middle East
2007-10-09 10:28:14 · 6 answers · asked by scottanthonydavis 4 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/10/08/AR2007100801817.html?hpid=topnews
Yes the link
The link for Neocon deniers!
Terrorism isn't an excuse to exterminate anyone against Globalism!
2007-10-09 10:35:01 · update #1
Armitadge was a scapegoat an old useless Neocon servant!
The whole World knows it was KArl Rove and Cheney who revealed Plame's name!
War with Iraq was the reason for the treason!
2007-10-09 10:38:05 · update #2
Everyday it is becoming more apparent just what side the people in the Bush administration really are on and its not on the side of the USA. They all appear to be treasonous and traitors and something should be done about them.
2007-10-10 01:45:15 · answer #1 · answered by Mario Savio 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
A couple of things here:
Valerie Plame while employed by the CIA was not a clandestine CIA operative
You said "Exposing a CIA officer is an act of treason" - Half true. Exposing a clandestine operative is a crime. Additionally, CIA officers (as well as military officers) serve at the pleasure of the president. The president can "out" anyone he wants.
You said "Now they have exposed a company who did nothing but research terror groups" - First, the only connection to the white house has been suspicion. The white house denies it. I read in Reuters about the release of the last tape from al Qaida. Reuters did not credit the release to the White House, they credited to a "private source". When they get something from the government, they credit it to an "anonymous government source.
2007-10-09 17:38:15 · answer #2 · answered by davidmi711 7 · 0⤊ 2⤋
The CIA officer which was "exposed" was not under cover and, despite all of the rhetoric, no laws were broken because of her "exposure." In short, she was not a covert agent.
For what it's worth, no one is silent on the net. All information is transmitted in packets and shared over many wide open path ways. Encryption is the key, not public websites - and the government, I'm confident, is monitoring the net for key words, addresses and so forth which might be linked to terror activities.
2007-10-09 17:39:28 · answer #3 · answered by LeAnne 7 · 1⤊ 2⤋
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/10/08/AR2007100801817.html?hpid=topnews
thats the link....
White House is bungling fools... I don't know if they are idiots, or if they are so evil, that there whole war on terror is a farce for them to make some war profits.
2007-10-09 17:32:42 · answer #4 · answered by BROOOOOKLYN 5 · 2⤊ 1⤋
No.
How could you go so long, and still not know who "outed" the CIA Secretary?
It was Armitadge, child.
Honey, you should start watching the News.
2007-10-09 17:35:20 · answer #5 · answered by wolf 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
careful.....theyll accuse you of hating 'Merika
2007-10-09 17:32:32 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋